Search for: "In re Cleland"
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2010, 9:49 am
We’re not monitoring bloggers and we have no plans to. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:47 am
They’re fast-paced. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm
It represents a preemptive surrender on America’s experiment with facilities-based competition and the beginning what Scott Cleland has correctly labeled a “de-competition policy. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 10:54 am
[Emphasis Cleland's] Predatory cross-subsidization”!! [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:08 pm
Eyes, nose, mouth—they’re all there. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:15 am
Group, 2009 WL 3720649, 2009 Pa.Super. 214 (November 9, 2009, Judges Freedberg, Cleland and Kelly) that the Superior Court issued an Order on December 30, 2009 denying the O'Hara's request for re-argument before an en banc panel.You may recall that O'Hara was a post-Koken case in which the Superior Court upheld UIM carrier's forum selection clause requiring UIM lawsuit to be brought in the county of the insured's legal domicile at the time of the… [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
Group, 2009 WL 3720649, 2009 Pa.Super. 214 (November 9, 2009, Judges Freedberg, Cleland and Kelly)(Consolidation vs. severance issue not implicated as plaintiff settled with tortfeasor and only sued UIM carrier in post-Koken case; Superior Court upholds UIM carrier's forum selection clause requiring UIM lawsuit to be brought in the county of the insured's legal domicile at the time of the accident)(As of November 30, 2009, the Plaintiff had filed for re-argument en banc… [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:43 am
Group, 2009 Pa.Super. 214 (November 9, 2009, Judges Freedberg, Cleland and Kelly)(Consolidation vs. severance issue not implicated as plaintiff settled with tortfeasor and only sued UIM carrier in post-Koken case; Superior Court upholds UIM carrier's forum selection clause requiring UIM lawsuit to be brought in the county of the insured's legal domicile at the time of the accident)(As of November 30, 2009, the Plaintiff had filed for re-argument en banc before the… [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 1:23 am
BEFORE: ALLEN, CLELAND AND FITZGERALD*fn1 , JJ. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:16 pm
You’re not planning… I’m so relieved. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 8:46 am
But in an extraordinary interview that should be read in its entirety, the FTC’s point man on the rules, Richard Cleland, surreally suggests bloggers should instead return review copies to the publishers — who don’t want them back! [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 9:18 am
Re-used? [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 8:08 pm
Miller says: There is copious, specific evidence … that the Bush regime has been engaging in massive election fraud systematically since 2000; that the last two presidential elections were stolen; that the 2004 election wasn’t even as close as we were thinking; and that they (theRepublicans) have also clearly rigged a number of congressional and gubernatorial electionsnationwide, including Don Siegelman’s contest for re-election in 2002 in Alabama [and] Max… [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 12:17 pm
"I don't want to see you back here unless you're visiting. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 5:37 pm
(If you're searching for pizza places on your mobile phone, you're probably hungry right this minute, making you an ideal marketing target for a local restaurateur.) [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 9:27 pm
Now, WE’RE GOING TO LEAVE?? [read post]
30 May 2007, 3:30 pm
"We're ready to make Japan as open as possible. [read post]
22 May 2007, 9:00 am
And that's what we're playing with. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 7:55 am
One thing we're pretty clear on is that Saddam has a very effective police state apparatus. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 1:09 am
Max Cleland, a disabled veteran and former head of the Department of Veterans Affairs? [read post]
