Search for: "In re Colvin"
Results 21 - 40
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
We’re very proud to announce that Brigit Kavanagh has joined our team as a Nonprofit Law Blog contributor and leader of NEO Law Group’s private foundation and charitable gift planning practice. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:32 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., August 18) (affirming denial of disability benefits)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 7:21 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., June 2, 2016) (affirming denial of disability benefits: the administrative law judge's reasons for discounting the relevant medical opinions were neither insufficient nor illegitimate)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 10:05 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., October 11, 2016)(affirming denial of disability benefits because Kirkpatrick failed to show that his RFC is unsupported by substantial evidence)*Elhelbawy v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 6:05 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., March 29, 2016) (affirming denial of benefits because any ALJ error as to a limitation on supervisor interaction was harmless)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 3:31 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., November 30, 2016) (affirming denial of disability benefits because Patterson's failed to satisfy disability criteria, the ALJ's credibility findings were supported by substantial evidence, and the appeals council properly declined to consider untimely records)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 9:15 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., March 7, 2016) (affirming denial of disability benefits based upon the medical and psychological reports)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 5:28 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., February 2, 2017) (affirming denial of disability insurance and supplemental security benefits: Covington failed to show she was disabled)*Rael v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:11 am
Colvin (10th Cir., March 15, 2016) (affirming denial of social security benefits, because Bradley failed to raise his claims below, and his arguments focused on merely technical omissions)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 9:48 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., November 1, 2016) (affirming denial of disability benefits and supplemental income: the ALJ properly evaluated credibility, weighed the medical evidence, and properly denied her motion to strike the vocational expert's testimony)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:42 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., December 21, 2015) (reversing denialof Supplemental Security Income benefits because ALJ failed to properlyconsider treating physician’s opinion)Simmons v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
So, fiscal sponsors on average don't feel they're knowledgeable but aren't too worried about compliance or risk management. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 2:25 pm
As I argued in the prior article, in the end these are two words in the English language you’re not going to get complete agreement on. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 9:35 pm
Colvin (10thCir., November 27, 2015) (affirming denial of disability benefits, Social Security Ruling 82-63’s presumption of disability in older claimants with limited education, work experience, and severe impairments)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:08 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., August 3, 2015) (affirming denial of disability insurance benefits)Workers CompensationMartinez v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 1:09 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., April 4, 2016) (reversing judgment in favor of Commissioner because the ALJ failed to properly evaluate consulting psychologist's opinion)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 7:21 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., June 2, 2016) (affirming denial of disability benefits: the administrative law judge's reasons for discounting the relevant medical opinions were neither insufficient nor illegitimate)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 8:15 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., December 10, 2015) (affirming denial of disability insurance benefits)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 9:48 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., May 26, 2016) (reversing denial of disability benefits because the administrative law judge improperly ignored a relevant medical opinion without justification)Workplace Violence/Weapons*Kerkhoff v. [read post]
21 May 2016, 2:51 am
Colvin (10th Cir., May 9, 2016) (affirming ALJ determination that Smith was not disabled)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
