Search for: "In re Contested Case Hearing re Conservation District Use Application "
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
But Not Everyone Thinks They’re Broken. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Can you tell us a little bit about that case? [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
It also sheds light on the thinking of governors who have pledged not to reverse course on reopening, even as coronavirus cases spike in their states. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
The senator used to work for the same firm before taking office. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
In four issues on appeal, appellants assert the trial court erred in finding breach of contract, enforcing a liquidated damages clause, applying prejudgment interest, and granting an unsegregated, contested attorney's fee application. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are 2 CEQA case pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are 2 CEQA case pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 3:00 am
As the case progressed, it became clear that Duncan Hunter had extramarital affairs with five different women and used campaign money to facilitate meetings. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia let stand an earlier ruling that President Trump’s accounting firm must turn over eight years of his financial records to Congress, bringing the case to the threshold of a likely U.S. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 10:06 pm
The Third Appellate District addressed this issue in a recent decision involving a statutorily mandated EIR prepared by the state Department of Conservation (“Department”) concerning fracking. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 11:50 am
United States (Native American Oral Traditional Evidence; Hearsay) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.html In the Matter of Contested Case Hearing Re Conservation District Use Application (CDUA) for the Thirty Meter Telescope at the Mauna Kea Science Reserver, Ka’ohe Mauka, Hamakua, Hawai’i, TMK (Native Hawaiian Sacred Sites; Telescope) People in Interest of M.V. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 5:10 am
State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlMatter of Contested Case Hearing Re Conservation District Use Application HA-3568 (Native Hawaiian Traditional and Customary Rights; Telescope) Tribal Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2018.htmlIn re Effect of Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 1:20 pm
Law Review & Bar Journal Bulletin (contact us if you need help finding a copy of an article)https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/lawreviews/2018.htmlReading Indian law: Evaluating thirty years of Indian law scholarship.Rent-A-Tribe: Using tribal immunity to shield patents from administrative review.State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlMatter of Contested Case Hearing Re Conservation District… [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 1:20 pm
Law Review & Bar Journal Bulletin (contact us if you need help finding a copy of an article)https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/lawreviews/2018.htmlReading Indian law: Evaluating thirty years of Indian law scholarship.Rent-A-Tribe: Using tribal immunity to shield patents from administrative review.State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlMatter of Contested Case Hearing Re Conservation District… [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
The court reasoned that even if the contested provisions could overcome the County’s position, the discretion arguably conferred to the Commissioner is only relevant when those discretionary provisions are applied to the approval of a specific permit. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
The court reasoned that even if the contested provisions could overcome the County’s position, the discretion arguably conferred to the Commissioner is only relevant when those discretionary provisions are applied to the approval of a specific permit. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
The court reasoned that even if the contested provisions could overcome the County’s position, the discretion arguably conferred to the Commissioner is only relevant when those discretionary provisions are applied to the approval of a specific permit. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
§ 10101 et seq.) preempt the application of the California Environmental Quality Act [CEQA] (Pub. [read post]
4 May 2017, 1:57 pm
Because the plaintiffs have the burden of showing likelihood of success on the merits at the preliminary injunction stage, she opted for a more conservative application of precedent and used “intermediate scrutiny. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:30 am
In re M.D., 38 Ohio St.3d 149 (1988) (The Supreme Court of Ohio will consider constitutional challenges to the application of statutes despite clear waiver in specific cases of plain error or where the rights and interests involved my warrant it.) [read post]