Search for: "In re Court Order Dated October 22, 2003" Results 21 - 40 of 142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2023, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
The Chancellor noted that in approaching this application for a variation, it was important to bear in mind that the petitioners did not come to the court with a tabula rasa, paragraph 22 of the earlier judgment. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:00 am by Tom Lamb
On October 22, 2010 Judge Keenan issued his Opinion & Order concerning various pre-trial motions by made by Merck's lawyers, which ended as follows: IV. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Ray Dowd
Dep't of Health & Human Res., 532 U.S. 598, 603–05, 121 S.Ct. 1835, 149 L.Ed.2d 855 (2001) ). [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
The PCC proposed that if additional money were raised for a further 22 chairs, 11 would be white and 11 would be blue (presumably the light blue) [11]. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
By order dated August 22, 2005, the court found that the action was barred based on res judicata, as well as the applicable statute of limitations, and the matter was dismissed. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 2:05 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Plaintiff failed to appear or ever communicate with the Court, despite the direct order of the Court to appear, until May 21, 2003. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
Thus, the earliest date Ethicon could be held liable for UCL violations was October 17, 2008, and the earliest date it could be held liable for FAL violations was October 17, 2009. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:40 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Supreme Court held that the finding in the November Family Court Order that Italy was the children's home country was now res judicata. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:40 am by Carolina Attorneys
Custody was later resolved through a consent order dated 23 February 2015. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 7:30 pm by Zachary Spilman
Department of Defense Directive 5500.17 dated May 3, 2003, details the “Role and Responsibilities of the Joint Service Committee (JSC) on Military Justice. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:04 pm by Giles Peaker
As the flat was vacant and had not been occupied since 2003, nobody was ‘lawfully residing there’ in the meaning of section 2 Protection from Eviction Act 1977 (no enforcement of forfeiture other than by court order). [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:53 pm by Joel R. Brandes
On October 24, 2014, Petitioner initiated divorce proceedings in the Court of First Instance No. 27 of Madrid. [read post]