Search for: "In re David G." Results 21 - 40 of 1,039
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2024, 5:21 am by David Post
  Some of you may have seen the article by David Segal in the Sunday NY Times several weeks ago [available here] about a rather sordid copyright fracas in which I have been embroiled over the past few months. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 11:40 am by CodeX
” A recent empirical study, for example, highlighted the relative effectiveness of auditory alarms in re-engaging inattentive drivers.[10] Advances in this direction continued to develop increasingly complex alarm systems.[11] The coupling of intelligent “alarms” that continuously monitor and account for live conditions of the road and alert drivers accordingly must be weighed against the explicit, written rules of the road. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 12:20 am by David Pocklington
 Re St Mary, Great Chart [2022] ECC Can, Re Christ Church, Harwood [2002] 1 WLR 2055, and Re St. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 7:55 am
I am deighted to pass along the announcement of the publication of (Anne Wagner and Sarah Marusek (eds)) Research Handbook on Legal Semiotics (Edward Elgar, 2023). [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Effects of New Rule 13D-G Regulations: Wolf Repellent or Entrenchment Fortifier? [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am by admin
Castleman       Martin Cherniack David Christiani  Arthur Frank Lennart Hardell  David G. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:26 pm by Greg Lambert
Yeah, so it’s people are finding that without the oil, you’re just a wrapper around GBT, right is that as the oil is necessary to refine that oil into the type of products that you’re looking for? [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 3:52 pm by Matthias Weller
Today, we are on the eve of the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention’s entry into force. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
  If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]