Search for: "In re Elevator Antitrust Litigation"
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2010, 9:58 pm
And when they're wrong, they're very very wrong - averaging an unnecessary expense of nearly $1.5 million one time out of four. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:23 am
Why did licensing get elevated? [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 12:29 pm
Unlike Concepcion, which involved fraud and false advertising claims under California law, In re American Express Merchants’ Litigation is a federal antitrust case. [read post]
11 May 2010, 12:26 pm
Today we’re bullish. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 4:16 pm
The law democratizes speech, and elevates the choices of users. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:32 am
See In re Biomet M2a Magnum Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, 2013 WL 6405156, at *2 (N.D. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
" The place where Republicans, antitrust plaintiffs, and the Cubs lose with startling regularity. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:38 am
The Court observed that “[a] plausible claim must plead ‘factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged,” quoting its earlier decision in In re Pre–Filled Propane Tank Antitrust Litig., 860 F.3d 1059, 1063 (8th Cir. 2017) (en banc). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In re Tesla Inc. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 10:01 pm
Miles, Dance on His Grave Pearl Goes Abu Ghraib on Will Ferrell Climate Change Litigation -- and Retirement Grease Annals of Antitrust Enforcement: Don't Blame Us I Played for Vince Lombardi Blawg Review has information about next week's host and instructions how to get your blawg posts reviewed in coming issues. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 3:35 pm
Twombly, in which the Supreme Court tightened up pleading standards in antitrust cases (and, arguably, in civil litigation more generally). [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
(Patents Post Grant Blog) Limited patent reexamination choices for late stage litigants (Patents Post Grant Blog) First Office Action backlog dips even lower (Director’s Forum) USPTO clarifies criteria for reissue error (Patent Baristas) Predicting patent litigation (Patently-O) Recent scholarship: Did Phillips change anything? [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
(Patents Post Grant Blog) Limited patent reexamination choices for late stage litigants (Patents Post Grant Blog) First Office Action backlog dips even lower (Director’s Forum) USPTO clarifies criteria for reissue error (Patent Baristas) Predicting patent litigation (Patently-O) Recent scholarship: Did Phillips change anything? [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm
Of the unclaimed marks, they’re not great: worst, problem, than, thank, their, said, problems, worse, worry, etc. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm
Sixth Circuit: But they're wrong, and we owe no deference to their interpretation of a criminal statute. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Gibson Dunn already is seeing a surge in labor and employment, consumer fraud, and products liability litigation. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:00 pm
This approach is expected to not only elevate service standards but also resonate with the evolving expectations of clients in the modern legal landscape. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 12:01 pm
Already subject to antitrust, labor, and privacy protection scrutiny, DiDi may have angered the CAC by moving ahead with its U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 5:14 pm
If you think that's not an attractive deal, I suggest you immediately take the elevator down to the street and ask the first ten people you encounter if they'd like such a job. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 8:59 pm
In the typical state court, 75% of cases involve at least one self-represented litigant. [read post]
