Search for: "In re Facebook, Inc. Derivative Litigation" Results 21 - 40 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Smart, shaking her head, asks Star, “What about Reg D compliance for the 50 investors who found out about Disruptive on Facebook and LinkedIn? [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 12:04 pm by William Ford, Tia Sewell
The committee will hear testimony from Jack Dorsey, the CEO of Twitter; Sundar Pichai, the CEO of Alphabet Inc. and Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook. [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:23 am by Kristian Soltes
Facebook Renames Blockchain Division After Libra ConfusionPaymentsSource – May 26, 2020 Facebook Inc. has renamed its blockchain division, called Calibra, to distance it from the Libra digital currency that Facebook created. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am by Kevin Kaufman
Constitution, as well as other constitutional provisions, and will almost certainly lead to extensive litigation. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
. *************************** “You guys think you’re above the law? [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am by Dennis Crouch
Nat’l Resource Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), courts give great deference to agency interpretations of statute, subject to certain conditions. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 1:20 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
First, we’re not sure about the anti-competitive implications of this case. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
Posted by Ric Marshall, MSCI Inc., on Friday, July 5, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Controlling shareholders, Dual-class stock, ESG, Institutional Investors, Lyft, Shareholder voting, Uber Director Independence and Oversight Obligation in Marchand v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
" The appellate court said that as it stood, Cox wasn't entitled to rely on safe harbor because it did very little (if anything) even when told about repeat offenders, re-affirming the jury decision that sided with BMG and awarded $25 million against Cox when they found the broadband carrier liable for piracy by its subscribers, even if over turning that decision. [read post]
Opponents of the DTSA argued that the ex parte seizure provision would open the door to abuse by purported “trade secret litigation trolls” and increase litigation costs. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 5:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This culminated in the decision in In re Trulia Shareholder Litigation, 129 A.3d 884 (Del. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:48 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Sept. 15, 2017) Related posts: Facebook Gets Bad Ruling In Face-Scanning Privacy Case–In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation Shutterfly Can’t Shake Face-Scanning Privacy Lawsuit Court Says Plaintiff Lacks Standing to Pursue Failure-to-Purge Claim Under the VPPA – Sterk v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 6:21 am by John Jascob
In a summary order, the panel found that a settlement provision deferring the question of common damages to be decided in a related action against Facebook and its underwriters was not required to be resolved by the district court under the PSLRA, and leaving the question open did not violate principles of finality (In re Facebook, Inc., IPO Securities and Derivative Litigation, December 27, 2016, per curiam). [read post]