Search for: "In re Foss"
Results 21 - 40
of 258
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2023, 7:53 am
It's a binary "you're with us or against us" attitude, motivated by the convenience of "cheap shots" at a bogeyman. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:17 am
" We're all in favor of energy efficiency. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:34 am
Follow @FOSSpatents on Twitter Follow FOSS Patents on LinkedInLinkedIn is the recommended platform if you prefer to focus on patent topics, while @FOSSpatents increasingly tweets about antitrust.Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 6:25 am
Thought leaders pushing for a trend reversal--I specifically also mean Lina Khan--were and are needed--but that is why I find it doubly unfortunate that they're picking the wrong target: a deal that actually spurs competition between large companies, and where the acquirer appears exceedingly cooperative. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 1:24 am
Follow @FOSSpatents on Twitter Follow FOSS Patents on LinkedInLinkedIn is the recommended platform if you prefer to focus on patent topics, while @FOSSpatents increasingly tweets about antitrust.Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 10:10 pm
There are parties who hope for years that they're not going to be sued: someone else will. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:06 am
As I mentioned in a recent post, several FOSS Patents blog posts were discussed at the Optis v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:17 am
Maybe we're going too far now? [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
This is a roundup post that discusses four different standard-essential patent (SEP) disputes and multiple jurisdictions. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:32 am
They're not doing that work pro bono. [read post]
20 May 2023, 6:15 am
Stasik explained, you'd like to generate that additional licensing income if you're a SEP holder, but you can't economically justify it. [read post]
19 May 2023, 5:03 am
Follow @FOSSpatents on Twitter Follow FOSS Patents on LinkedInLinkedIn is the recommended platform if you prefer to focus on patent topics, w [read post]
17 May 2023, 1:49 am
The CMA's leaders saw yesterday that there is quite some skepticism of the agency's regulatory excess in the parliamentary committee they're accountable to. [read post]
15 May 2023, 7:37 am
Another important difference is that DG COMP has multiple industry-focused merger units (org chart (PDF)), one of which (COMP.C.5) focuses on IT, communication, and media industry mergers, while the members of the CMA's Microsoft-ABK inquiry group have zero tech industry background (if anything, they're experts in the financial services industry) and investigate mergers in a wide range of industries. [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:52 am
They're simply about maximizing the value of the sales leads IPlytics' salespersons can then follow up on. [read post]
2 May 2023, 3:37 am
They're not huge, but they can be outcome-determinative. [read post]
1 May 2023, 3:30 am
We're not at the point where an Illumina-Grail approach--closing the deal without regulatory approval--would merely be contemplated. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 7:06 am
Sarah Cardell, the recently-appointed CEO and former long-time General Counsel of the UK Competition & Markets Authority (CMA), made the mistake of her (professional) life when ruling against Microsoft's purchase of Activision Blizzard King (ABK) on a nonsensical basis. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 1:24 am
They're just structurally on the wrong track, and they obviously weren't able to do a complete overhaul over the past month. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 8:00 pm
In this blog, I’m interviewing Jessie Foss. [read post]
