Search for: "In re Garcia (1998)" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  So far many plaintiffs have had trouble coming up with factual support to back such allegations – and sometimes we’re not even sure why they’re making them. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
FAS Technologies, Inc., 138 F. 3d 1448, 1454 (CA Fed. 1998) (en banc) (claim construction does not involve “factual evidentiary findings” (citation and internal quota­ tion marks omitted)); Lighting Ballast, supra, at 1284 (claim construction has “arguably factual aspects”); Dow Jones & Co. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm by INFORRM
The most important legal news of the week was the Conservative Party’s widely condemned proposals for repeal of the Human Rights Act 1998. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
”  Today we’re examining another Louisiana legal peculiarity. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:00 am by Steve Vladeck
Yesterday’s news out of the Supreme Court may well have obscured another significant detainee-related legal development: As Lyle Denniston has noted over at SCOTUSblog, on Friday, the en banc Ninth Circuit handed down a thoroughly fractured decision in Garcia v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm by Bexis
., 658 N.W.2d 127 (Mich. 2003)) or the Sixth Circuit (Garcia v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:24 am by Steve Vladeck
The more I re-read Judge Kavanaugh's majority opinion in Omar v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:32 pm by Kelley Jones King
” In re Epic Holdings, Inc., 985 S.W.2d 41, 51 (Tex. 1998) (emphasis added) (citing Texaco, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 908 P.2d 1095, 1104 (Colo. 1995); Garcia v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:49 pm by Mark J. Caruso, attorney
In 1998, one of the first cases went to trial in Texas, where a jury awarded the plaintiff $23.4 million. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
A lot of what follows is taken in more or less edited form from the amicus brief that Bexis filed with the California Supreme Court in Conte - a copy of which we're making available, here.One major problem with Conte is that the court placed form over substance. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
Stamison (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1001, 1010;Grier, at p. 438.)7 Section 5058, subdivision (a), provides in relevant part: "The [CDCR Secretary] mayprescribe and amend rules and regulations for the administration of the prisons . . . . [read post]