Search for: "In re Glass"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
In re Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC, No. 77484850 (April 11, 2012) [not precedential].The Board began by finding that Pittsburgh is a place generally known to the American public. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:36 pm
So, these products are not just counterfeit, but also fake –– they’re sold as eclipse glasses, but they are not safe for solar viewing…” We have pared down our list to give preference to North American manufacturers and importers and their major authorized resellers; after all, the April 8th solar eclipse is almost exclusively a North American event, and this site is a service of the American Astronomical Society. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 3:07 am
As noted on their blog, Glass Lewis posted 54 pages of ’18 policy updates last week, which includes a summary of the policy changes on the first page (we’re posting memos in our “Proxy Advisors” Practice Area). [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:53 am
Considerations for Decision Making Source: ComplexDiscovery The post From Glass House to Glassdoor? [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 10:49 am
If you're going to have federal insurance, it might be the only way to prevent too-big-to-fail moral hazard. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 3:21 am
” This Glass Lewis statement isn’t posted on the Glass Lewis site nor on its blog, at least not yet. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
In re 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc., Serial No. 88690528 (December 6, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cindy B. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:58 am
Simons and Chabris argue that people are fundamentally incapable of looking away from where they’re headed for more than a couple of seconds without losing their bearings. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 7:32 am
It's like you're killing half of me. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
For valuable insight from ISS and Glass Lewis, sign up for our “Proxy Disclosure & 20th Annual Executive Compensation Conferences,” and do it soon because they’re happening next week already! [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:19 pm
Eisenberg, who recently re-joined Horvitz & Levy LLP as Of Counsel, is one of the attorneys representing Glass in the Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 9:10 am
That we're dealing with very small numbers and countervailing overall trends encourages particular caution in over-interpreting the data. [read post]
31 Aug 2024, 3:18 am
Krueger appealed, arguing that the hotel should have known about the broken glass and that the doctrine of “res ipsa loquitur” should apply, allowing negligence to be inferred from the circumstances of the injury. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 7:57 pm
") As the sole author of the haikus, you can definitely register them a single unit but we're not sure of the copyright status of the glass negatives (or what you've contributed) so we're unclear whether your modifications as a group merit a single unit registration for the whole book. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:39 pm
David Cameron Carr blogs about the Supreme Court of California's return of 24 disciplinary cases to the State Bar for re-evaluation, and At the Lectern updates us on the pending fight for the admission of disgraced journalist Stephen Glass. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
In re Halogen Lighting Products, Serial No. 78426018 (September 29, 2008) [not precedential].Examining Attorney Sandra Manios argued that the specimens of use show the design used in connection with the wording "NO BROKEN GLASS," and thus the design functions only "to inform consumers that applicant's goods contain glass that will not break. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 8:35 am
If you're not interested in curbside glass recycling, you can still drop off your glass for recycling at one of twenty drop off sites in Salt Lake County. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 1:14 pm
Your attorney asserted the doctrine of res ipsa loquitor, telling the judge that, but for the negligence of the defendant, there was no explanation for the glass being in the cake inside the factory-sealed package. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 10:32 am
Above all, even when you’re following the law, don’t hurt yourself or others by failing to pay attention to the road. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:56 pm
But meanwhile, we’re pleasantly surprised to report a very trenchant analysis of the technology’s implications for our privacy by none other than Michael Chertoff. [read post]
