Search for: "In re Hubbell"
Results 21 - 40
of 432
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2008, 9:56 am
"We're putting resources to bear that only an established company can know to produce. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Especially from Martindale-Hubbell? [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:05 am
This app is a great mobile tool that allows legal professionals to find, evaluate and connect with the right lawyer while they’re on the go. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 11:33 am
We're here for the long haul, and are fully aware that there are no legitimate short cuts. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 2:41 pm
We're going to hear of some successes. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 9:11 am
(photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/anniferrr/4305013252/) Are Martindale Hubbell’s Fees Really Worth It? [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 11:45 am
Martindale-Hubbell has apologized for blog spam left on my site, using the comments area of my prior post for that purpose. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:49 am
'But Martindale-Hubbell costs so much and we're not sure it's worth it anymore, Martindale feels like a dinosaur.'Martindale has not had an active presence in Web 2.0. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:35 am
Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27 (2000) and lower court cases like In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 383 F.3d 905 (9th Cir.2004); U.S. v.... [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 6:00 pm
Martindale-Hubbell. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 8:24 am
Turkewitz is spot on in asking lawyers and law firms who use Martindale-Hubbell: How would you rate M-H? [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 7:00 pm
We're not for a minute defending spamming, nor have we ever done so, I'm not sure whether there's a teaching moment in there. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:29 am
Martindale-Hubbell released an interesting report this morning called "The Profitable Legal Department: How legal departments can prosper by generating revenue for their company. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 10:01 pm
See at Law.com "Martindale-Hubbell gets a makeover". [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 10:21 am
And see our August post "Martindale-Hubbell: Should we all 'just say no'? [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 11:28 am
The opinion is here: Order re Privilege of Remaining Documents. *** For an excellent discussion of Judge Carter’s methodology and ruling, see Joyce Vance, Civil Discourse, The Attorney-Client Privilege Doesn’t Apply To Committing Crimes. *** Read more… [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 2:19 pm
The order is here: Order re: Special Purpose Grand Jury’s Final Report [2022-EX-000024]. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 9:42 am
In re Reed Elsevier Properties, Inc., No. 06=1309 (Fed. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 2:49 am
Go look and honestly tell me you're thinking any different. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 2:49 am
Go look and honestly tell me you're thinking any different. [read post]
