Search for: "In re Interest of Edward B."
Results 21 - 40
of 366
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
Pix Credit hereOne of the most interesting turns in the organization of economic activity, at least within liberal democratic and post-colonial environments, has been the development of a rhetoric for, an ideology of, and a set of working models that can be drawn upon by economic enterprises that seek not merely to comply with law and the expectations of the market, but also to actively participate in the management of social change. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
Swaps, like other derivatives, are instruments for (re-)allocating risk. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am
He cited Re St Margaret, Rottingdean (No 2) [2021] ECC Chi 1 in which a faculty was granted for the the re-carving of two headstones which used offensive language concerning two music hall artistes. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
E199 (2010). [2] Notice of retraction for Teng Zeng & William Mitch, “Oral intake of ranitidine increases urinary excretion of N-nitrosodimethylamine,” 37 Carcinogenesis 625 (2016), published online (May 4, 2021) (retraction requested by authors with an acknowledgement that they had used incorrect analytical methods for their study). [3] Tianwei He, “Retraction of global scientific publications from 2001 to 2010,” 96 Scientometrics 555 (2013); Bhumika Bhatt, “A… [read post]
28 May 2023, 9:23 pm
Federal Supreme Court, Appeal No. 57/24 of 21 March 2006, allowing the payment of simple interests only, but not compound interests.). [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Part of Just Security’s work on accountability and election law. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Or does the nominee intend to serve as a faithful representative of an activist stockholder or a special interest group (favoring, for example, immediate voluntary carbon reduction or the elimination of plastic packaging)? [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 4:01 am
(b) The horn shall not otherwise be used, except as a theft alarm system. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
In short, the Law Society’s position is: (a) it is entirely proper to report a minor breach (barring confidentiality issues) because it might be indicative of more serious concerns, and (b) if you’re still not sure, ask the Law Society. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:50 am
B, or both. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
Rehnquist, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, to Edward L. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 8:40 am
If you’re interested in doing a deep dive into these areas, my research team and I used this data in a few papers this year: Jason Rantanen, Missing Decisions and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 170 U. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:32 pm
So that’s a interest of mine, I want to know what’s going on with other law firms and what kind of podcasts they’re putting out. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 7:01 am
Furthermore, increased geopolitical tensions with China and supply chain disruptions associated with both the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine have increased interest in bringing manufacturing operations, particularly in high-tech or strategically important industries, back to the United States.[2] In that context, a carbon tax could hinder the development, or redevelopment, of the domestic manufacturing base in industries that are both strategically important and… [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 7:00 am
B. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
See Edwards v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:10 am
That’s exactly what we’re going to talk about here. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
The ”long” progressive era, to apply to Novak’s periodization a convention popularized by historian Rebecca Edwards, witnessed the creation of the “modern democratic state” (235), an achievement that—as Novak declares, in a characteristically exuberant rhetorical flourish—was “arguably” the “most significant legal-political development of the twentieth century” (2). [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Mattingly (2nd Cir. 2009); Edwards v. [read post]
