Search for: "In re Jennifer H."
Results 21 - 40
of 221
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2022, 4:30 pm
Joshua Lenon 7:33 Yeah, we don’t know the full details of Jennifer’s employment agreement with JL K and H. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 11:27 am
” That rule applies in this episode not only to Jennifer, but to the law firm of GLK/H as well. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:12 pm
GLK/H Technology – Heavy use of MS Office At the encouragement of our friend Sarah Glassmeyer, we look into the type of technology at GLK/H. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:10 am
It’s, we’re finally getting into some of the GLK and H litigation parts of it. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 7:42 pm
Jen Walters finds herself without a job after GLK/H got a mistrial ruling. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 8:31 pm
Everyone deserves competent legal representation and GLK/H’s high-dollar attorneys plan to do just that. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:20 pm
Moose; Jennifer L. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 11:46 am
Ass’n 2008 (2000); David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, and Douglas G Altman, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement,” 6 PLoS Med e1000097 (2009). [5] In re Incretin-Based Therapies Prods. [read post]
26 May 2022, 10:49 am
Author David Garrow praised the opinion in the Wall Street Journal (prompting letters from Professor Steven Calabresi and Jennifer Mascott). [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:54 am
Ellen is a professor in sports media, in the Roy H. [read post]
23 May 2022, 5:00 am
“We’re living in a bizarre age of misinformation and political polarization. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 9:30 am
Altfield (I)Group 28 Jennifer D. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 9:47 am
by Neil H. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
Judge Jennifer Campbell said there is no evidence that lawmakers ever intended to exempt themselves when they approved the laws. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 9:35 am
by Neil H. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:30 pm
AltfieldGroup 28 Jennifer D. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
It is simply wrong to say: “Republicans unconstitutionally targeted Democratic-controlled states by limiting SALT, but now that we have the power to legislate, we’re going to leave that constitutionally invalid provision in place—because we want to show that we’re progressive. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Supp. 2d 992, 1199–1200 (E.D.N.Y. 2006), rev’d on other grounds, 522 F.3d 215 (2d Cir. 2008) (describing confounding in studies of low-tar cigarettes, where authors failed to account for confounding and assessing healthier life styles in users) Third Circuit In re Zoloft Prods. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
This essay is not a normative argument in defense of deference, but rather an account of how the District Court in Texas boldly—and without discussion or acknowledgment—did away with such deference in ordering the Biden administration to re-start MPP, and how the Supreme Court, in refusing to stay the injunction, seemed not to mind. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 1:00 am
Although, of course, you’re helping. [read post]
