Search for: "In re Jonathan F." Results 21 - 40 of 429
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2011, 3:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Const. art. 6, § 1 (creating the unified court system); In re Deposit Ins. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:25 pm by Jonathan Bailey
Show Notes About the Hosts Jonathan Bailey Jonathan Bailey (@plagiarismtoday) is the Webmaster and author of Plagiarism Today (Hint: You’re there now) and works as a copyright and plagiarism consultant. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:32 am by Ross Davies
Lamberth, In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 846 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C. 2012) - Ojetta R. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:30 am
February 19, 2014 - 2 PM: In re Drew Estate Holding Company LLC, Serial No. 77840485 [Section 2(e)(3) refusal to register KUBA KUBA BY DREW ESTATE on the ground that the mark is primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive of "Cigars made with Cuban seed tobacco"]  [Note that in In re Jonathan Drew, Inc. d/b/a Drew Estate 97 USPQ2d 1640 (TTAB 2011) [precedential], the Board found the mark KUBA KUBA to be primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive of… [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 7:20 am by Nikita Stepin
Mes collègues Brian Daley et Jonathan Chong ont préparé un billet plus détaillé sur cette question disponible ici. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
No, not Jonathan Lee Riches. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 6:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
I don’t think Zittrain ignores this, but I was struck by Bartow’s extension of the argument to say that “[f]or companies, closely following the acts and omissions of their customers or client base is generative behavior, even though it relies on tethers. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 2:56 am by John L. Welch
As the Board stated in In re Jonathan Drew [KUBA KUBA for cigars], direct evidence of materiality is not required. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 6:46 am by Jonathan H. Adler
If there ever was a "libertarian moment," Williamson argues we're quite far from one now. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:59 am
"To put it mildly, Ozersky's piece is so silly it almost seems like intentional satire, along the lines of Jonathan Swift's A Modest Proposal.[3] To put it less mildly, it is brain-numbingly asinine. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 4:25 am
§§ 1051, 1052, and 1127; In re Cooper, 254 F.2d 611, 117 USPQ 396, 400 (CCPA 1958). [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 7:05 am by Josh Wright
Mazzeo, Associate Professor, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University - Jonathan Hillel, J.D., Northwestern University School of Law (2009) - Samantha Zyontz, Senior Research Associate, Searle Civil Justice Institute, George Mason University School of Law Willful Patent Infringement and Enhanced Damages after In Re Seagate: An Empirical Study - Christopher B. [read post]