Search for: "In re Jonathan H."
Results 21 - 40
of 533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2024, 4:43 am
You're not. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 2:26 pm
It may well be the case that, based upon new and more complete data, the globeberry should be (re)listed as threatened or endangered under the Act. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Jonathan F. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:43 am
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0752-x Buber, I., & Engelhardt, H. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm
When a first-term President opts to seek a second term, his campaign to win re-election is not an official presidential act. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 8:59 am
His op-ed begins: When college students who sympathize with Palestinians chant "From the river to the sea," do they know what they're talking about? [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:16 am
Just basic VC merch. ] We're not known for our design savvy or fashion sense at the VC, but we've nonetheless thought it worth offering some basic Volokh Conspiracy merchandise. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:52 am
Langbein, John H. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am
Attorney General Jonathan Kanter and FTC Chair Lina Khan. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 11:46 am
”Jonathan C., executive “I use LII constantly in my work. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 10:40 am
The bottom line is that a silver bullet to prevent the re-election of Donald Trump remains hard to find. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 3:52 pm
Today, we are on the eve of the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention’s entry into force. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
Endnotes 1Section 913(g)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Act added section 211(h) to the Advisers Act. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
Endnotes 1Section 913(g)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Act added section 211(h) to the Advisers Act. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
ENDNOTES [1] Section 913(g)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Act added section 211(h) to the Advisers Act [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
At the FDIC, Vice Chair Travis Hill and board member Jonathan McKernan voted against issuing the Capital Proposal and issued strong statements sharply critical of the Capital Proposal, particularly the deviation from the Endgame Standard. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 12:52 pm
Chief Judge Sutton summarized the issue in In re: Juntoff as follows: In passing the Affordable Care Act, Congress created a "Shared Responsibility Payment" for individuals who did not purchase qualifying individual health insurance plans. [read post]
14 May 2023, 12:19 am
H. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:07 am
The reason there will be no more than 58 opinions in argued cases is because one of those cases (In re Grand Jury) was DIGed (dismissed as improvidently granted), and SEC v. [read post]
