Search for: "In re Joshua S. (1986)"
Results 21 - 24
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
___, 112 S. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
Civ. 1ère, No. 13-23566.March was all about the 'Blurred Lines' in copyright and a US Jury's decision to award $7.3 million to the Estate of Marvin Gaye on the basis that Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke’s soul-inspired pop song "Blurred Lines" too closely mirrored Gaye’s 1977 single "Got to Give It Up". [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
An early leader on this point is Chad Squitieri, who’s written about the MQD’s potential inconsistencies with the conservative justices’ avowed methodologies. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]