Search for: "In re Kennard"
Results 21 - 40
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2014, 1:38 pm
Although deadlocks are relatively rare, they’re not unheard of at the Court. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 9:30 am
Come on.For this reason, I'm somewhat sympathetic to Justice Kennard's dissent. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
Justice Kennard asked petitioner to clarify exactly what she wanted the ruling to be any why? [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 2:11 pm
I say this, by the way, notwithstanding the fact that in today's cases, you actually have disagreement; in one case, by Justice Werdegar, and in the other, by Justice Kennard. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 8:56 am
Justices Mosk and Kennard, for example, dissented. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 5:40 pm
Perhaps that's because they're well aware of the gun's existence. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:13 pm
And when you have Justice Joyce Kennard interrupting your sputtering every 30 seconds to restate the question she doesn't think you're managing to answer, you might wanna just call it a day. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:50 pm
Download PDF file of In re Marriage Cases [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 11:07 am
Justice Joyce Kennard: ??? [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 12:15 pm
Just report to the cops that they're driving drunk or have a gun and watch the guns-drawn fun.The fact that everyone agrees on the result here doesn't mean there's substantial agreement, and Justice Kennard writes a separate concurrence, as does Justice Werdegar (joined by Justice Moreno), to explain their disagreement with many of the arguments adopted by the majority. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:33 am
A state district court judge recently re-sentenced Kennard to time served under the new sentencing guidelines. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
I think we're simply looking at whether a class waiver is okay. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 10:09 am
., re: UCL). [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 2:42 pm
We're all used to the United States Supreme Court and its fractured political composition, which in turn generates lots of dissents -- and often somewhat vitriolic ones, at that. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 11:49 am
Review Denied (with dissenting justices) In re Marriage of Hofer, S205582—Review Denied [Kennard, J., voting for review]—November 20, 2012. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:20 pm
re here.??? [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 8:27 pm
In re Cipro Cases I & II, S198616—Review Granted—February 15, 2012 The question presented is whether a suit may be brought under the Cartwright Antitrust Act to challenge “reverse exclusionary payments” made by pharmaceutical manufacturers to settle patent litigation with generic drug producers and prolong the life of the patents in question. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 9:11 am
A state district court judge recently re-sentenced Kennard to time served under the new sentencing guidelines. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
Justice Kennard went on: "You're asking us to agree with your position because it's reflected in the pretty clear statutory scheme, the use of the word 'pay' in (b). [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:11 am
Kennard by former Gov. [read post]
