Search for: "In re Lee (1980)" Results 21 - 40 of 212
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2022, 8:03 am by Jessica Rich
We’re watching here for clues about the FTC’s ability to navigate the cumbersome Mag-Moss process in proceedings that (at this juncture) are narrower and more focused than the FTC’s privacy effort. [read post]
And indeed the SEC did so, responding to Staff experience with that standard by making adjustments to these rules in the 1980s.[11] In 2010, in light of decades of experience with these disclosures, the SEC took further regulatory action in the form of Commission-level guidance regarding when climate-change developments require disclosure under SEC rules. [read post]
10 May 2022, 12:49 pm by David Chidlaw and Carina Novell
However, Representative Cindy Axne, also of Iowa, re-introduced the bill in May 2021.[11] It is currently under review by the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 9:02 am by David Chidlaw and Carina Novell
However, Representative Cindy Axne, also of Iowa, re-introduced the bill in May 2021.[11] It is currently under review by the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
[Doomsday warnings don't hold up] The debate over carrying firearms outside the home often is accompanied by predictions that public carry will lead to more violent crime. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
[Or for that matter to women, to unmarried women, or to women based on age, race, national origin, religion, citizenship (other-"natural-born" or otherwise), and the like?] [read post]
25 May 2021, 9:31 am
  For decades, especially since the 1980s, the great schism in the comprehensive vision of human rights memorialized in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, has split the nations of the globe and especially their elites. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
A statement from Rahman Lowe Solicitors, who represented Cage in its libel claim, said it had seen an email to an editor from the journalist who wrote the story raising concerns that “the below article was re-nosed in editing without consulting me to change the meaning of the top line”. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:45 pm
(hotel room), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 834, 101 S.Ct. 107, 66 L.Ed.2d 40 (1980); United States v. [read post]