Search for: "In re Marriage of Powers (1990)" Results 21 - 40 of 126
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
  Vermeule describes a concept that is inherently anti-utilitarian, anti-aggregative, and concerned first and foremost with the res publica. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:02 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
It also means forcing girls to carry pregnancies inflicted on them through incest and child marriage. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 12:23 am by Frank Cranmer
Overkill, maybe: but we haven’t seen so much interest in a consistory court judgment since Re St Giles, Exhall. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 4:12 am by SHG
” had referred to a genuine and powerful force on campus for the previous decade. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:42 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Del Giudice, 678 NE 2d 47 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist., 6th Div. 1997 Of course, no one thinks “one day my husband or wife will be broke and creditors will try to foreclose on our home. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm by Ellis Cose
After World War I, it quickly became clear that the war to make the world “safe for democracy” had not made America safe for equality. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 4:38 am by Russell Knight
” In re Estate of Anderson, 552 NE 2d 429 – Ill: Appellate Court, 4th Dist. 1990 If addition to waiving the right to renounce a will, a prenuptial agreement can also waive a spouse’s right to their intestate share of the deceased’s estate if there is no will. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm by Josh Blackman
Under that law, if the governor finds that there is, quote, a natural technological or manmade emergency, or disaster of major proportions, the governor can perform and exercise such functions, powers and duties as are necessary to promote and secure the safety and protection of the civilian population. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
So, if you're right about that, why should we even entertain the question whether to overrule Smith? [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm by Marty Lederman
In my post yesterday, I suggested that the case might possibly turn on a rather narrow, fact-dependent question--namely, whether the City has discriminated against CSS on the basis of its religious opposition to same-sex marriage. [read post]