Search for: "In re Oracle Corporation Derivative Litigation" Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
  But interestingly this view caused a split with the actual creators of music who were taking a very different view to the corporate owners of copyrights - as they still saw big benefits from the planned Copyright Directive. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:46 am
On December 4, 2019, Vice Chancellor Sam Glassock III issued a memorandum opinion in In re Oracle Corporation Derivative Litigation finding that the Lead Plaintiff in a shareholder derivative suit against Oracle’s board of directors had the right to subpoena documents relied upon by the corporation’s Special Litigation Committee (SLC) in making its determination as to whether litigation against… [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 2:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In our view, this hesitation stems from then-Vice Chancellor Leo Strine’s notorious 2003 decision in In Re Oracle Corp. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:06 pm by MOTP
The insurance policy, which was reinsured by the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) under the authority of the Federal Crop Insurance Act,[4] contains an arbitration clause in section 20(a): If you and we fail to agree on any determination made by us except those specified in section 20(d), the disagreement may be resolved through mediation in accordance with section 20(g). [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 3:00 am by Ann Lipton
I am intrigued by VC Glasscock’s recent decision in In re Oracle Corporation Derivative Litigation, where he found that demand was excused with respect to a claim that Larry Ellison breached his fiduciary duties by functionally directing that the company... [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 1:16 pm by Andrew Keane Woods
(Indeed, the Ninth Circuit recently held in Oracle v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
As the creative industries continued to grow economically in importance in 2014, so have the stakes in copyright litigation. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
So, blocking orders: fine so long as they're reasonable! [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am by tekEditor
Kalpakian 446 F.2d 738 (9th Cir. 1971) 14 In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litig. 712 F. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:50 am by Steve Bainbridge
The litigation will require Delaware courts to review a bylaw that would increase Delaware's market share of corporate litigation. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 4:35 am by Broc Romanek
The litigation will require Delaware courts to review a bylaw that would increase Delaware's market share of corporate litigation. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
” In truth, however, the bill addresses a wish list for large corporate interests. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:46 am by Francis Pileggi
”  The Supreme Court also noted that it has previously cited Brophy approvingly when discussing how the duty of loyalty governs the misuse of confidential corporate information by fiduciaries in In re Oracle Corp. [read post]