Search for: "In re Pers. Restraint of Scott"
Results 21 - 21
of 21
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2007, 4:04 am
Miles and the Court's subsequent erosion of per se liability for vertical restraints, the most pervasive justifications for and against minimum RPM per se illegality, and finally, several alternative rule-of-reason formulations available to the Supreme Court should it eliminate per se treatment for minimum RPM.
Tax TipsWednesday, January 10, 2007By Sidney KessSidney Kess, CPA-attorney, consulting editor to CCH Inc., author and lecturer,… [read post]