Search for: "In re Pohl"
Results 21 - 40
of 226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2013, 7:41 am
And with that, we’re in recess. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 2:56 pm
He can certainly advise the court, if you’re going to do this, about the qualifications of the people you should appoint, Kammen argues. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 3:11 pm
And. . .we’re adjourned until Thursday morning. [read post]
5 May 2012, 10:46 am
More generally and going forward, he says: When I rule, for either side, we’re done. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 11:30 am
The previous two days have been closed sessions, but now we’re all assembled for a public session. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 10:24 am
Now we’re back–and Judge Pohl is reading something, presumably the Woods order, while trial counsel Commander Andrea Lockhart stands at the podium. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 6:55 am
Colonel Pohl. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 3:18 pm
Responds Kammen, we’re asking you to hear from him and if you think it appropriate, craft an order influencing the way the 706 board conducts its business. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 1:01 pm
We’re back. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:14 pm
” Trivett tells him that they’re not willing to say, but clarifies that the government is not precluding a future dangerousness argument going forward. [read post]
5 May 2012, 3:15 pm
You’re swearing to make your best effort to represent your client. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
“That’s where we’re at,” she says. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:14 am
We’re back in session. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 1:08 pm
The key issues in In re Pohl-Boskamp GmbH & Co., centered around whether the mark functioned as a trademark and whether peppermint affected the quality of the product. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 9:30 am
Pohl and Mr. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:30 am
We’re in a quick coffee recess. [read post]
5 May 2012, 2:31 pm
Is that what you’re telling me, Judge Pohl asks? [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:38 am
We’re in a ten minute recess. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:20 am
Judge Pohl notes this for the record. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:49 am
We're talking about exculpatory material helpful to the defense, lessening the sentence. [read post]
