Search for: "In re Robert D. (1984)" Results 21 - 40 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2010, 7:55 pm
I think I've watched every State of the Union since 1984. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm by Norman L. Eisen
On Monday, August 14, 2023, former President Donald Trump—along with eighteen other individuals—was indicted for the fourth time, on this occasion with 41 criminal charges in Georgia stemming from an alleged conspiracy to overturn the 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am by Eric Goldman
They’re subtweeting the US Olympic Committee for telling them not to tweet about the Olympics. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am by Aaron L. Nielson
In In re Dolly Varden Chocolate Co., decided in 1924, the Court reiterated that “the words ‘Merrie Christmas’ [do] not to constitute a valid technical trade-mark for ribbon. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am by Dennis Crouch
., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), courts give great deference to agency interpretations of statute, subject to certain conditions. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Mass. 2009); In re Neurontin Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability Litigation, 257 F.R.D. 315, 324 (D. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:26 am by Russ Bensing
I initially had my doubts about that theory, mainly because I figured that since Roberts would get to assign the writing of the majority opinion, he’d give that job to himself, given the significance of the decision. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 11:01 pm
Skip the numbered paragraphs if you're already au current.1. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:35 pm by Jeff Gamso
  If there was any doubt, Justice Rehnquist made it clear back in 1984. [read post]