Search for: "In re Smith (1978)"
Results 21 - 40
of 189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
It can also be understood as shared perceptions of the meaning of reality backed by massive background consensus (Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms (William Rehg (trans) MIT Press, 1996); pp. 22, 322); or as biopolitics (the narratives through which social and political power may be normalized over the control and management of the bodies of the living and their relationship to physical and abstract objects and the technologies of control) (Michel Foucault, The Birth of Biopolitics:… [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm
The good news is after the holiday was effectively ruined last year, we’re more or less back in business in 2021. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the District of Maine Smith v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the District of Maine Smith v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 4:44 am
” In re Nevitt, 117 F. 448, 460 (8th Cir. 1902) If the court deems it inappropriate in light of your past non-compliance, you may not return to court later to present your side of the case or have your lawyer present your case in your absence. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:37 pm
Pa. 1999) (a Chapter 7 petition may be dismissed under § 707(a) for lack of good faith in filing the petition); In re Smith, 229 B.R. 895, 897 (Bankr. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 2:35 pm
As a drug lawyer in Minnesota, the phrase, “One man’s trash is another man’s treasure,” comes to mind frequently. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 9:51 am
App.3d 793, 798, 14 Ill.Dec. 416, 372 N.E.2d 427 (1978), quoting Ill.Ann.Stat., ch. 110, par. 57.1, Historical & Practice Notes, at 132 (Smith-Hurd 1968). [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Do Critics of Police Have the First Amendment Procedural Protections That Nazis Get?
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
See In re T.R. (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 6, 16 n.9 (adult civil and criminal proceedings are "presumptively open to the public"); State ex rel. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
But we're not, and we're doing that on purpose. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
See In re T.R. (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 6, 16 n.9 (adult civil and criminal proceedings are "presumptively open to the public"); State ex rel. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 6:22 pm
App.3d 793, 798, 14 Ill.Dec. 416, 372 N.E.2d 427 (1978), quoting Ill.Ann.Stat., ch. 110, par. 57.1, Historical & Practice Notes, at 132 (Smith-Hurd 1968). [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
We're happy to share. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 1:25 pm
"); In re Juan C., 33 Cal. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 11:00 am
Ohio State Bar Ass'n, 436 U.S. 447, 456 (1978), citing a labor threat case, NLRB v. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 9:05 pm
Smith, H. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 5:52 am
However, 3M responded in a position paper: "Although certain PFAS have been detected in the environment at low levels, their mere presence does not mean they're harmful. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
" See Smith v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 1:20 pm
: A View from the Trenches of Law, the State and SocietyBOKHARY Kemal– Light Emanating from the ShadeCASSEL Par– Sovereignty in China: The Careers of a Concept, from the late Qing through the PRCCHEN Yu-Jie– China’s and International Human Rights: Law, Politics and Global GovernanceCHENG Jie– Modernity, Identity and 40 Years’ Quest for Constitutionalism in ChinaCLARKE Donald– China’s Legal Non-Construction ProjectCOHEN Jerome– Was Helping China… [read post]
