Search for: "In re Stauffer"
Results 21 - 39
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2011, 10:19 am
The parties in Pequignot did not appeal the district court's constitutional decision, and in Stauffer v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
And our head of collections services, Julie Stauffer, generated a list of illustrated law rare books that I could review. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 10:25 pm
"What can we do to make their transition work so they won't re-offend? [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am
BIC (Docket Report) Should false marking claims be stayed pending in a decision in Stauffer? [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 7:18 am
Damages can be awarded for accelerated market re-entry damages (i.e. the infringer has a "head start"). [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:45 am
We're still scratching our head about how she was allowed to compete if she was not eligible. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 7:27 am
Under that doctrine, courts will overlook a taxpayer's 'mere compliance with the Code,' Stauffer's Estate v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm
La Cafetière, Inc (Property intangible) TTAB affirms 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of ROUGE TOMATE for fruit and vegetable juices (TTABlog) TTAB finds THE FITNESS SNEAKER generic for… guess what? [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 8:55 am
Wäre ein höherer Betrag notwendig gewesen, hätte die X. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:15 am
(not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARRERA for welding helmets: In re A.C.E. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
It may be hiding in plain sight in US patent database (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Interview with Mike Drummond of Inventors Digest (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Impact of merger/buyout on prior agreement to not challenge patent validity: Epistar v ITC (Patently-O) (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC affirms in part, reverses in part, vacates in part and remands Linear Technology Corporation v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC: Genetech & Volkswagon – Federal Circuit… [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:43 am
Once we’re outside of factual statements and implication, you are assuming that the rest [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
Can make clear that you’re not [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:59 am
A: Then they're likely to be confusing! [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm
And, in Stauffer v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:18 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 4:03 am
(You’re welcome. ;) ) Tonya Evans, Widener Law Sampling, Looping and Mashing...Oh My! [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am
Senior IP Scholar Session Paul Goldstein, Stanford Law School A lot of the industry-specific provisions of copyright have no present justification and should be tossed (e.g., cable licensing); mature industry likes settled rules, but that’s not good enough. [read post]
