Search for: "In re Whittington"
Results 21 - 40
of 105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2021, 2:53 pm
And they're absolutely right, this is a profound question, civil libertarians have kind of pooh poohed it and said, well, empirically good ideas do win out. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:04 am
*Donohue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562** Siddaway v Board of Governors of Bethlem Hospital [1985] AC 871*** Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11**** Briody v St Helens and Knowsley Health Authority [2001] EWCA Civ 1010**** XX v Whittington [2020 UKSC 14 [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 3:19 pm
And the brief cites several posts from Volokh Conspiracy co-bloggers Jonathan Adler, Ilya Somin, and Keith Whittington. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 5:25 pm
If we're going to reason based on authority and precedent, I'll take Bingham and Sumner over Johnson's defenders any day of the week. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 1:17 pm
" He then exhorts his supporters (who are known to include violent elements) to "fight like Hell to establish Fascism, and if you don't fight like Hell, you're not going to have a country anymore. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm
” WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK The Congressional Research Service (CRS) released a report documenting Federal Bureau of Investigation facial recognition programs used to support federal, state, and local law enforcement. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:04 am
” As Princeton’s Keith Whittington notes, what these words mean seems to change with the wind. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:20 am
Unless, of course, they’re racists. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 8:28 am
In light of these pardons, Keith Whittington advocated for a constitutional amendment to the executive’s pardon power. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:43 pm
What, indeed, do we think we’re doing, as a collective constitutional order, in requiring them? [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 11:15 am
The restrictions we're facing are bitter pills, but their very bitterness offers a good deal of assurance that we won't, in the long term, keep consuming them when there is no real danger. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 8:00 am
Not because we know enough to have an opinion on the merits, but because we're not immune from the appeal of snark in a title, we smiled when we saw that Mark Graber, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, has posted Ship Money: The Case that Time and Whittington Forgot, which is forthcoming in Constitutional Commentary:The absence of Ship-Money from the canon of judicial review creates a lacuna in the scholarship on the theoretical foundations for judicial… [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 5:03 am
Nothing we can do about it until that president is up for re-election. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 9:18 am
Co-blogger Keith Whittington posted a thoughtful essay here on the meaning of the special oath that Senators will take before the trial convenes, swearing to "do impartial justice" in impeachment proceedings. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 7:02 pm
Of course, that option would be premised on President Trump winning re-election. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 3:27 pm
Of course, that option would be premised on President Trump winning re-election. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:39 am
Whittington (@kewhittington) November 20, 2019 And Jack Metzler, who has argued in front of the Court, wrote that we were "suggesting someone should off CJ Roberts. [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 8:49 am
These reinforces Keith Whittington's point that impeachment does not require the commission of a crime. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
Once you're done with the Museum, the Bud & Wilma Eyman Research Library contains its own mini-museum: the Robert G. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm
” And I certainly agree with Whittington and Brandwein that “the Court cannot ‘bootstrap’ its way to the status of the ultimate interpreter. [read post]
