Search for: "In re William S. (1970)" Results 21 - 40 of 373
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Investment Company Act of 1940 There is a saying when you’re in the woods. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:20 am by Michael C. Dorf
Okay, now onto the coronation.]The American history I learned in elementary school in the 1970s was not exactly nuanced. [read post]
We all should wonder why it happened without much opposition from this diverse United States.The 1970s and 1980s Are the Seedbed for the Current Supreme Court’s Conservative MakeupIn 1971, the Supreme Court affirmed a lower court decision in Coit v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Guest Author
*This is the introductory post in a symposium on William Araiza’s Rebuilding Expertise: Creating Effective and Trustworthy Regulation in an Age of Doubt. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
One of Selikoff’s great achievements, the federalization of worker safety and health in the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970,[3] languishes because of inadequate resources for enforcement and frivolous efforts to address non-existent problems, such as the lowering of the crystalline silica permissible exposure limit. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 6:50 am by Lucie Gulino
If a petitioner is denied at any stage of the process, including if the governor ignores the individual’s petition entirely, the individual may re-apply in one year. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Guest Author
*This is the sixth post in a symposium on Morgan Ricks, Ganesh Sitaraman, Shelley Welton, and Lev Menand’s “Networks, Platforms, and Utilities: Law and Policy. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm by admin
Asbestos litigation existed as workman’s compensation cases from the 1930s, and as occasional, isolated cases against manufacturers, from the late 1950s.[1] By 1970, federal regulation of asbestos, in both occupational and environmental settings, however, helped create a legal perpetual motion machine that is still running, half a century later. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
It then draws on this examination to re-cast the project of human rights legalities as a semiotic contestation—a system of interpenetration centered in law but structurally coupled with globalization and governance. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 4:11 am by SHG
Decided against this backdrop, Williams was an anomaly the day it issued in 1970. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:56 am by OTy9gYz
The Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 (AMLA), enacted on January 1, 2021 as part of the William M. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 4:26 am
"  February 2, 2018: I quoted William Safire, writing in 1970: "A spirit of national masochism prevails, encouraged by an effete corps of impudent snobs who characterize themselves as intellectuals. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 7:05 am by Neil H. Buchanan
 And do not forget that I am quoting from the source that Fwill himself cited in support of his BS assertion that the Fed’s primary purpose is to prevent inflation.This is all in part merely a bad imitation of Democratic Senator William Proxmire's silly "Golden Fleece Awards" from the 1970's (which I explain at the end of this column), where uninformed critics take anti-intellectual potshots at government research activities… [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm by Mark Walsh
(William Hennessy) Sometime after Blatt refers to a page of the 2nd Circuit decision that “they’re yakking about,” Justice Samuel Alito picks up on her word choice. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 4:59 am
William Friedkin's classic stands the test of time. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm by admin
The challenger must identify a standard of care, and the challenged witness’s deviation(s) from that standard. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 9:30 pm by Josh Blackman
He talked about his work on In Re Sealed Case, which became Morrison v. [read post]