Search for: "In re the Dependency of: A.C."
Results 21 - 27
of 27
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2011, 5:54 am
If so apply “the ultimate balancing test” which has four elements identified by Lord Steyn (in Re S (A Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication) [2005] 1 A.C. 593 at para 17): “First, neither article [8 or 10] has as such precedence over the other. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 6:44 pm
Pollak, [1927] A.C. 732 (H.L.), at p. 776.) [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:25 pm
Law enforcement officials shared the grim repercussions of sexting with A.C. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 1:04 am
(citing A.C. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 11:07 pm
Cir. 2007); In re Cruciferous Sprout Litig., 301 F.3d 1343, 1347 (Fed. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
Limitation periods start when a Plaintiff has, or ought to have, discovered, a viable cause of action for any head of damage. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 11:15 am
Pollak [1927] A.C. 732 (H.L.), at p. 776.) [read post]
