Search for: "In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. M. S. and A. M. A., Parents"
Results 21 - 40
of 145
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
If I am then I agree with Mr Dean that the court has to conduct a pure, fact-specific Re S balancing exercise. [read post]
18 May 2022, 2:07 pm
Perez (Cultural Resources; Native American Graves Protection Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html Matter of Welfare of Children A.J.J. ( Indian Child Welfare Act; Minnesota Indian Family Preservation Act) In re M. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:40 am
And I’m not alone. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:20 pm
In practice, s97 is most often relaxed where a child is missing or abducted and there is a need for a public appeal featuring the child’s name and picture, but there are occasional examples of the relaxation of s97 in other circumstances, including where there is no direct positive benefit to the child (see Al M (Children) [2020] EWCA Civ 283, and Griffiths v Tickle). [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
’ and which reminded me that I’d wanted for a while to write something looking at the meaning of coercive and controlling behaviour (or CCB), because sometimes I’m not sure we’re all singing from the same hymn sheet. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 11:38 am
Interested candidates should send their resume to Attorney General Howard M. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
Instead, what is needed is a drilling down to the specifics, not generalised assumptions about the impact on children of publication or assertions that welfare is just more important. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
When considering applications under Section 8 of the Children Act 1989, the court has regard to the child’s welfare and in particular the factors set out in the welfare checklist at Section 1(3) of Children Act 1989. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 2:15 pm
An order of protection may require a party to the case to obey specific conditions like staying away from a parent or children or refraining from an activity that might risk the welfare of the child. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
I’m not sure why they think a signature is all it takes to terminate a parent-child relationship…because that’s definitely not how it works in Illinois. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 5:16 am
I focus on that part because the errors seem more numerous and glaring; I'm not sure if that's because I'm more familiar with the relevant history, or the book simply isn't as bad until it gets to modern times. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:30 pm
The federal Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) requires that the court inquire into whether either parent has Native American ancestry before we terminate parental rights; it's motivated by a shameful history of wrongfully taking away children from Native American parents. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
The Code does not typically have special rules for special areas of practice, but family violence is not strictly a family law matter. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 1:34 pm
”[14] A sustained discussion of digitization and children’s rights only emerged around 2014, as the CRC organized a Day of General Discussion on “Digital media and children’s rights. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 3:36 am
We’re all tired – pull your weight. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm
So as not to make this post overly long, I'll assume familiarity with my post from yesterday, where I discuss some of these matters in greater detail.Is Philadelphia's Nondiscrimination Condition Generally Applicable? [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 8:06 am
A social welfare agency objects on religious grounds to Philadelphia’s rule requiring it to place foster children with LGBTQ parents. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 5:32 pm
I focus on that part because the errors seem more numerous and glaring; I'm not sure if that's because I'm more familiar with the relevant history, or the book simply isn't as bad until it gets to modern times. [read post]
