Search for: "In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. R. S. and T. A. S., Parents"
Results 21 - 29
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
“Justice Kagan, even people who come into a marriage thinking they don’t want to have children often end up with children,” John J. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 11:24 am
Co., 443 U.S. 97, 107 (1979) (Rehnquist, J., concurring) (recognizing that juvenile proceedings historically “have been conducted outside of the public’s full gaze … [out of] concern for the welfare of the child…. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Opinion in In re Paternity of F.T.R. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am
Parent’s Incarceration Not an Automatic Reason for Blocking Visitation In Matter of Granger v Miscercola, --- N.E.2d ----, 2013 WL 1798581 (N. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:58 am
Parents of children covered by welfare are eligible for the state-federal health program only if they make no more than $188 a month for a family of three. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:03 pm
This doesn’t mean humans shouldn’t try to foresee problems associated with new technologies or address them preemptively. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Ciavarella, Jr. and Michael T. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:36 pm
Lisa R., it found that a stipulation signed by the birth mother conferred a legal right to her lesbian partner to exercise the role of parent. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 3:07 am
The juvenile court was envisioned more as a surrogate parent than a prosecutor. [read post]
