Search for: "In the Interest of: E.G. v. Juvenile Officer" Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2014, 9:21 am by Venkat Balasubramani
June 4, 2014) Related posts: Police Officers Aren’t Liable For Investigating Cyberstalking and Revenge Porn–Keaton v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 11:56 am by Gritsforbreakfast
To me, the more interesting development on Tuesday concerned the committee's squelching of yet another rural county's ploy to use incarceration - in this case, of juveniles - as an economic development gambit. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
Attorney’s Office described their alleged criminal acts as follows: Taking action to remove funding for the Luzerne County juvenile detention facility, effectively closing that facility; Ordering juveniles to be sent to the facilities in which they had a financial interest even when juvenile probation officers did not recommend detention; Entering a “Placement Guarantee Agreement” to house children in a facility in which the… [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 5:21 am
Moran, 453 Mass. 880, 906 N.E.2d 343 (2012), included the following:On the afternoon of July 13, 2014, an officer with the Fairhaven police department located the deceased in his truck, parked in a store parking lot. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 11:51 am
In addition, Officer Davis was provided with all of the business records kept by Ibrahim from his purchasing the laptop from appellant as well as the surveillance footage that had recorded the transaction as it took place.Ziad Ibrahim testified appellant entered his store and stated that he was interested in selling the MacBook Pro he was holding because he had purchased a new one. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:54 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Moller Police Officers Aren’t Liable For Investigating Cyberstalking and Revenge Porn–Keaton v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 6:39 am
  You can, if you are interested, find a news story about the investigation here. [read post]