Search for: "In the Interest of: J.M. of: J.M." Results 21 - 40 of 186
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2008, 3:32 pm
The Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science Blog has a post on an interesting paper by J.M. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 5:50 pm by JB
[The full Westlaw formula, in case you are interested, is: TE(Jack /2 Balkin) and date (aft 2012) and date (bef 2018).]Unfortunately for me, I wrote under a different name, J.M. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:22 pm
The Nov. 5th Court of Appeals decision in the case of Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of J.M. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 1:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
It must be remembered that this is about the best interests of the child and not the best interests of the parents.... [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 8:00 am by Lewis Silver
Lewis Silver is a law student who still holds on to the faint hope of escaping to J.M. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
A recent post by photographer J.M. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 8:49 am by Lauren Vodopia
’s mother by both Audria and Michael, that she has always lived with J.M., J.M. has known her as his mom since his birth and that the best interest of J.M. dictates that she be given shared legal custody and visitation with him. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 2:43 pm by Cody M. Poplin
We then move on to ideology and propaganda with J.M. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Although not a biological parent or an adoptive parent, the wife asserted that the best interest of J.M. dictated that the wife be given shared legal custody of and visitation with J.M. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 9:12 am by Daniel Clement
This Court concludes based on the evidence that plaintiff, defendant and Audria can and will get along as they have in the past, to maintain J.M.'s psychological stability and to act in his best interest, and that they will be able to cooperate in making major decisions in J.M.'s life such as health, education and welfare as they have done for his entire life. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 9:12 am by Daniel Clement
This Court concludes based on the evidence that plaintiff, defendant and Audria can and will get along as they have in the past, to maintain J.M.'s psychological stability and to act in his best interest, and that they will be able to cooperate in making major decisions in J.M.'s life such as health, education and welfare as they have done for his entire life. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 9:12 am by Daniel Clement
This Court concludes based on the evidence that plaintiff, defendant and Audria can and will get along as they have in the past, to maintain J.M.'s psychological stability and to act in his best interest, and that they will be able to cooperate in making major decisions in J.M.'s life such as health, education and welfare as they have done for his entire life. [read post]