Search for: "In the Interest of: S.W. (Complete Opinion)" Results 21 - 40 of 182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Wolfgang Demino
CASH BIZ, LP,CASH ZONE, LLC D/B/A CASH BIZ AND REDWOOD FINANCIALS, LLC PANEL MAJORITY OPINION BY THE COURT OF APPEALS BELOWWITH DISSENTING OPINION BY JUSTICE MARTINEZ  CASH BIZ, LP, Redwood Financial, LLC, Cash Zone, LLC dba Cash Biz, Appellants,v.Hiawatha HENRY, Addie Harris, Montray Norris, and Roosevelt Coleman Jr., et al., Appellees.No. 04-15-00469-CV.Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio.Delivered and Filed: July 27, 2016.Philip A. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 12:56 am
Justice Graves concurred in a separate opinion. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 3:02 pm
It is a fascinating case with three interesting and compelling (no pun intended) opinions. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
That set up raises an interesting policy question: when someone is injured by a generic drug that failed to warn of the side effects the drug could cause, then which company bears responsibility for the injury? [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm by MOTP
The Panel opinion faults the appellant for failing to cite sufficient caselaw on the matter of the creditor's burden to substantiate the interest component of its claim with competent evidence. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
(summary judgment affirmed even though defendant filed controverting affidavit denying receipt of credit card agreement offered as summary judgment proof and denying agreement on interest rates).Wakefield v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:44 am by malik11397
OPINION BY: JIM HANNAH OPINION JIM HANNAH, Chief Justice Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:18 pm
Moreover, I am interested in how you'd argue the question of harm: does look [read post]