Search for: "In the Interest of Na B"
Results 21 - 40
of 284
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2023, 2:25 am
” Andrea Ferrara, CHRO at PepsiCo Beverages NA, couldn’t agree more. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:00 am
– to receive interesting posts drawn from the Law Library of Congress’s vast collections and our staff’s expertise in U.S., foreign, and international law. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am
As with his naïve utilitarianism, Bentham’s contributions to jurisprudence often ignored the realities of human experience and decision making. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 6:38 am
Once inside a cell, NAs are triphosphorylated into their active form in three steps, illustrated in the diagram below, which is taken from the parties’ Statement of Agreed Common General Knowledge annexed to the judgment: The first phosphorylation step was known to be rate limiting and there was an interest at the priority date in developing monophosphorylated NAs, but monophosphorylated NAs are charged and cannot enter a cell. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 5:55 am
Article 13(b) of the ICC Statute allows for the referral of situations concerning non-States parties by the United Nations Security Council, an organ that is inherently political and selective. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 6:01 pm
With the formation of Silicon Valley Bank, NA, the insured deposits of SVB previously transferred to DINB two days prior were then transferred to Silicon Valley Bank, NA. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm
There’s a nice naïve literalism that would say the PTO can do this but courts have no power to do so: if the PTO hasn’t so presumed, courts are not in a position to do so. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 7:23 am
Interesting issues: secondary meaning, abandonment, functionality, likely confusion, dilution. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 1:55 am
Key Findings A typical American household with four phones on a “family share” plan, paying $100 per month for taxable wireless service, would pay nearly $305 per year in taxes, fees, and government surcharges—up slightly from $300 in 2021. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 8:40 pm
And no doubt some rent-seeking interests will insert their favorite provisions into the final omnibus: clouds of lobbyists certainly are working overtime on this. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
And it is futile to think that we can have international courts that will always render the decisions we want to promote our interests. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
That question is at the heart of an interesting case being litigated in Georgia, in which the validity of Georgia’s 2019 “Living Infants Fairness and Equality (LIFE) Act” is at issue. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 6:22 pm
Id. at 21-23. b. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 8:33 pm
Sex-based harassment 16(b) The definition of harassment on the ground of sex[1] will be amended to remove the element of “seriousness”. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
This post assesses the Solicitor General’s argument, in New York v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:55 am
The regulations are filled with naïve policy ideas. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:27 pm
Bifurcation is unavailable because of Dewsnup, and stripping a wholly unsecured lien is unavailable in Chapter 7 because of Bank of America, NA v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
In Sweeny v Ireland [2017] IEHC 702 (23 November 2017) Baker J in the High Court struck down section 9(1)(b) of the Offences Against the State (Amendment) Act, 1998 (also here), which provided for a wide offence of withholding material information from Gardaí, on the grounds that it infringed the right to silence derived from the right to freedom of expression in Article 40. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
Banks (see Annexe B, para. 14) one of the arguments before me involved going back a few pages in the text to reflect on whether this was really just about the “gold and diamond deals” (see Annexe B, para. 8) which Mr. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm
The Court thought the statute could be validly applied because of the strong interest in protecting judges against intimidation. [read post]
