Search for: "In the Interest of SB" Results 21 - 40 of 1,913
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2010, 2:29 pm by JudicialWatchWeb
Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce has filed a memorandum with the United States Court for the District of Arizona opposing the Obama Justice Department’s “Motion for Preliminary Injunction,” which would prevent sections of Senator Pearce’s SB 1070 from taking effect on July 29. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 11:30 am by expertim
Section 69 of SB 405, amending NRS 86.401, specifies that the charging order is the “exclusive remedy” by which a creditor of a member “may satisfy a judgment out of the member’s interest…whether the limited-liability company has one member or more than one member. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:50 am by gstasiewicz
District Court for the District of Arizona stating: “The Legislature…has a paramount interest in seeing that [SB 1070’s] enactment is upheld. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:16 pm
This article addresses some of the key elements of SB 375, discusses potential issues, and describes the opportunities presented to interested parties and stakeholders to get involved in the process to protect their interests at an early stage. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:25 am by gstasiewicz
According to today’s Judicial Watch’s court filing: “To further the interests of his legislative district and all citizens of Arizona, Senator Pearce authored SB 1070. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:37 pm by Neil Schoenblum
Section 69 of SB 405, amending NRS 86.401, specifies that the charging order is the “exclusive remedy” by which a creditor of a member “may satisfy a judgment out of the member’s interest…whether the limited-liability company has one member or more than one member. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:20 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  A contact in the environmental consulting industry relates that a trusted source has advised that political pressure from organized labor interests killed the bill. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:42 am by Molly Foley-Healy
In my CCIOA 101 for HOA Boards blog posting yesterday, I addressed the Reserve Study Policy – which is one of the 9 Responsible Governance Policies (commonly referred to as “SB 100 Policies”) that HOAs are required to adopt and comply with under the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (“CCIOA”). [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:43 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Further developments, hopefully illuminating the Legislative policy concern motivating this specific proposal, will undoubtedly be followed with interest by CEQA practitioners and consultants. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 11:36 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (SB 754) Precluding real party in interest project developers from contracting for or even “overseeing” CEQA review for their projects. [read post]