Search for: "In the Interest of TM"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,001
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am
Timberlake thinks only source significance matters; McKenna is worried about other things as well.Discussant: Stacey Dogan: Key motivator for TM is interests D is representing, either individually (justification for own use) or more generally (interest in protecting freedom to use descriptively). [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 12:32 pm
As a Florida patent attorney, I have a number of clients that innovate in the areas of health, fitness, and exercise equipment. that will find this post of interest. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
After the TM directive, went to CJEU, which said that a sign always used with a mark could be registered; never asked the question of public interest in leaving phrase free. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 6:34 am
The Infosys judgment, citing paragraph 42 of Kabushiki judgment, categorically noted that Section 46 & Section 56 of TM Act, 1958 engrain private interest and public interest respectively. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 7:14 am
” The case that was made to expand TM rights involved the reputational interests and market preemption of mark owners; tied to consumer interests [see Mark's comment below for more on that relation]. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am
Interesting how much we talked about territoriality in various ways here. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
What's interesting from an IP perspective is the number of top brands that don't use R or TM alongside their brands. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
That is: We do have situations protecting against these other harms w/o reputation.The way in which we interact w/TMs is so varied—we know very little. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
Moving in the right direction for defining boundaries, so post-sale and initial interest confusion pose the biggest threat of unwarranted expansion of TM into other fields. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 8:06 am
The post Bad Faith TM Applicants, Bad News appeared first on Harris Bricken Sliwoski LLP. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm
Where expressive interests are heightened, as they are in fashion designs, this Circuit has not hesitated to adopt rules that protect creators. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:21 am
McGeveran has identified many such interests, and Tushnet also in the value of play. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
Law takes into account interests other than those of TM owners. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:16 pm
Mark McKenna should be interested in this one, which also features Stacey Dogan and Glynn Lunney. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:49 am
That’s the preeminent policy interest. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm
Interested in output over input measures like marketing signals. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:04 am
Following the previous post about the difficulties experienced by RSA’s TM Registry, which you can read here, Afro-Leo, with the help Katherine Harding, have established that an application was made by the Registry under Section 6 of the Trade Marks Act for additional hearing officers to be appointed, sadly to no avail. [read post]
11 Aug 2006, 11:03 am
The Ninth Circuit has always seemed to have more than its fair share of interesting trademark cases. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 7:21 am
Cir. 2021) (en banc subsequently denied) Federal Circuit on TM Licensing: We’re going to Enforce the Terms [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 10:36 pm
Sheetz Flushing Subway’s Footlong TM Hope? [read post]
