Search for: "In the Matter of Richard N. Bell"
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2013, 12:32 am
The Supreme Court has 'h[e]ld that … [n]either the Copyright Statute nor any other says that because a thing is patentable it may not be copyrighted.' [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
United States, 727 F.2d 950, 953 n.3 (10th Cir. 1984). [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
(Richard Posner, ed., 1997). [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
According to the Guardian, former Daily Star reporter Richard Peppiatt was one half of the pantomime horse greeting Brooks at the RCJ. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:16 am
” At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog, Bernard Bell offers the last in a series of posts on Food Marketing Institute v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:15 am
J. 371***Richard L. [read post]
24 May 2023, 2:44 pm
Meltzer of Meltzer & Bell, P.A., who represent Burns. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm
You’ll see here that we’re reading poems and a play.Seán Patrick Donlan (@spdonlan): Perhaps JM Coetzee's Waiting for the Barbarians (1980) or Giuseppe Tomasi di Lampedusa's The Leopard (1958)? [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
Bell, Marbury v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 8:15 am
The matter is yet to be resolved, but it certainly promises an interesting outcome. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:00 am
Despite widespread evidence of systemic irregularities and questionable practices, the financier was so massive and economically potent that no one wants to bell the cat. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:26 pm
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, 552 F.3d 430, 435 n.3. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
With respect to the other Supreme Court case about copyright subject matter, Georgia v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Bell Sports, Inc. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
The company could not overcome the presumption that blanket bans on such insignia are unlawful under the Act, failing to convince the court of appeals that public image considerations or food safety concerns constituted “special circumstances” justifying the prohibition (In-N-Out Burger, Inc. v NLRB, July 6, 2018, Graves, J., Jr.). 7th Cir.: Supervisor’s use of N-word to deny he was racis [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Rev. 1159 (2009/2010) Rachel Bell, ARTICLE: Estate of Pew v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Rev. 1159 (2009/2010) Rachel Bell, ARTICLE: Estate of Pew v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 4:08 pm
The CRTC has denied the Bell Coalition’s proposal for website blocking reforms which would have compromised net neutrality, Michael Geist’s Blog has coverage. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
Comm’n, 499 U.S. 144 (1991). [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 4:04 pm
Michael Geist continues to consider Bell Media’s controversial Fair Play initiative. [read post]
