Search for: "In the Matter of an Anonymous Member of South Carolina Bar"
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The Protocol sets out a framework by which the highest authority courts of member states may as the court to give advisory opinions on matters involving the application of ECHR rights. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 4:41 pm
Health plans and insurers, their service providers that act as business associates within the meaning of the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA) and employer and other health plan sponsors, fiduciaries, and other management leaders should heed the warnings contained in the new Resolution Agreement (FileFax Resolution Agreement) with former HIPAA business associate FileFax, Inc. announced by the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) Office of Civil Rights… [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
District Court for the District of South Carolina: U.S. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:07 pm
Brett Fellows, managing member of Oak Capital Advisors in Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, lost his right to use the CFP certification mark for one year after he allegedly misrepresented that forms utilized to transfer customer accounts to a new broker-dealer were merely administrative. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 1:00 pm
In the Matter of Anonymous Member of the South Carolina Bar, 346 S.C. 177, 552 S.E.2d 10 (2001). [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
South Dakota Rep. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
South Dakota Rep. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 9:25 am
Two years ago, in In the Matter of Anonymous Member of the South Carolina Bar, 392 S.C. 328, 709 S.E.2d 633 (2011), an attorney was issued a letter of caution for sending an uncivil email that she alleged was sent in response to numerous uncivil communications she had received from opposing counsel. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 4:12 pm
” The South Carolina Supreme Court case finding that our civility oath didn’t violate a lawyer’s right to free speech, In the Matter of Anonymous Member of the South Carolina Bar, 392 S.C. 328, 709 S.E.2d 633 (2011), dealt strictly with incivility in the context of ongoing legal representation. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 1:12 pm
I do hope that Sheryl's health issues are resolved, although it doesn't appear the South Carolina Bar disbarred her for that reason. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:58 am
According to the Sex Offender Management Board, only California, Alabama, South Carolina and Florida mandate lifetime registration for all sex offenders. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:58 am
According to the Sex Offender Management Board, only California, Alabama, South Carolina and Florida mandate lifetime registration for all sex offenders. [read blog]
12 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Brian Comer discovers the Stiletto Heel Warranty in South Carolina. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:52 am
In re Anonymous Member of South Carolina Bar, __ S.E.2d __, 2011 WL 1548025 (South Carolina Supreme Court 2011). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:32 pm
The April 25, 2011 Supreme Court opinion, In the Matter of Anonymous Member of the South Carolina Bar, is an indication of just how strongly the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) and the South Carolina Supreme Court are pushing civility concerns. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm
(RT: He almost sounds like a union member.) [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:22 pm
One other thing to keep in mind – does the length of the adjournment of the deposition matter? [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 7:24 am
Monday’s opinion in In the Matter of Anonymous Member of the SC Bar privately admonished an attorney for having sexual relations with his client’s spouse. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 4:58 am
As part of the oath lawyers take upon their admission to the South Carolina bar, they swear to “maintain the dignity of the legal system. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:39 am
In the Matter of Anonymous Member of the South Carolina Bar, 346 S.C. 177, 552 S.E.2d 10 (2001), explains how defending counsel is to conduct him or herself during a deposition in accord with the requirements of Rule 30(j) of the South Carolina Rule of Civil Procedure (a rule derived from Judge Robert S. [read post]
