Search for: "In the Matter of the Adoption of J.L."
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2015, 1:12 pm
J.L. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am
J.L. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
J.L. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:29 am
J.L. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 2:31 pm
And nothing in that rule requires amici to have a "legally cognizable interest" in the matter. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:28 pm
J.L. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:40 am
J.L., ? [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm
This understanding (which might have been incorrect as a matter of English law) was adopted by the American Framers, and carried forward by antebellum state courts. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
Public pressure did force the adoption of the initial cloture rule in 1917, but that may not be enough this time.[15] In some cases the Senate responds only to institutional pressure. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 7:35 am
J.L & Pub. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:05 pm
J.L. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Fernlund and J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, Presidents of Chambers, A. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:40 am
J.L. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm
J.L. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
Relief in equity was not viewed as a matter of right but was deemed as subject to the discretion of the court. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
J.L. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm
One story that is repeated countless times in the lore of Section 404 is that at the time the SEC adopted the rules, the agency estimated Section 404 compliance costs to be approximately $91,000 per firm.[1] This number was heavily criticized by many as grossly underestimating the true costs associated with Section 404.[2] Critics of the SEC would routinely cite this number as evidence that the SEC had no idea just how costly complying with Section 404 was.[3] In my… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 6:48 am
The analysis assumes that in each scenario, all countries would adopt the same rules for that particular scenario. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 12:26 pm
And finally, no court has adopted the dissent's view that Rule 4(k)(2) alone suffices to extend substantive personal jurisdiction to the constitutional limit, and the Rule's language alone suggests otherwise. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
” Proponents of free labor and racial equality in the Thirty-Ninth Congress repeatedly declared that persons who violated their oaths of office were not, in the words of Representative J.L. [read post]
