Search for: "In the Matter of the Application for a Judgment Confirming the Arbitration Award Issued in an Arbitration Proceeding Commenced By:" Results 21 - 40 of 63
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2022, 9:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The matter was remitted to the Supreme Court for the issuance of an order compelling compliance with this decision and judgment. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Baker Hughes then filed an application to compel arbitration of the license and release issue before the mediator and a petition for declaratory judgment. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:07 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Lawyers who represented clients in arbitration had generally favorable assessments of the process and award, but expressed concerns about the adequacy of arbitrators’ knowledge of both substantive issues and arbitration procedures. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am by Guangjian Tu
[viii] In the author’s view, these considerations for arbitration-favored policy can be distilled as the following four limbs: (1) adherence to the parties’ autonomy to the largest extent, (2) promoting the fairness and efficiency of commercial arbitration, (3) minimizing the judicial interference throughout the arbitration proceedings, including the stages before and after the issuance of the arbitral award, among others, refraining… [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 9:48 am by blogarbadmin
PCBIOS argued that the interim measure was crucial to guarantee the effectiveness of a future award in arbitral proceedings yet to be commenced. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 9:21 am by Eliana Baer
In New Jersey, the issue has been undecided for several decades, with the trial courts remaining divided on the issue of whether a recalcitrant husband can be compelled to give a Get and/or into arbitration proceedings in Beis Din (Rabbinical Court) proceedings to adjudicate the matter under religious doctrine. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:33 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
 Sistem then commenced an application against the Republic under the International Commercial Arbitration Act and the State Immunity Act seeking recognition and enforcement of the Award, to which the Republic failed to respond. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:30 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Because the record demonstrates otherwise, we reverse the court of appeals’ judgment and remand the case to the court of appeals for further proceedings. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:36 pm
’s motion to confirm the arbitration award and entered judgment in favor of M.O. and against Insured in the amount of $5,200,000. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Each party shall include with the first pleading a certification as to whether the matter in controversy is the subject of any other action pending in any court or of a pending arbitration proceeding, or whether any other action or arbitration proceeding is contemplated; and, if so, the certification shall identify such actions and all parties thereto. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:00 pm by Jan von Hein
Accordingly, “it is incompatible with [the Regulation] for a court of a Member State to make an order to restrain a person from commencing or continuing proceedings before the courts of another Member State on the ground that such proceedings would be contrary to an arbitration agreement. [read post]
28 May 2023, 9:23 pm by Béligh Elbalti
Outside the field of family law, the issue of public policy was raised in particular with respect to the consistency of interests with Sharia principles, especially in the context of arbitration (see, e.g., DSC, Appeal No. 132/2012 of 18 September 2012 finding that compound and simple interests awarded by an LCIA arbitral award did not violate Sharia. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
The trial court signed a final judgment on June 10, 2005, denying appellants’ request to vacate the arbitration award and confirming the arbitration award. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Zeevi sought recognition and enforcement of the award in the Jerusalem district court, which ruled in its favor and held, as a matter of Israeli law, that the contract did not limit confirmation proceedings to Bulgaria. [read post]