Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: F. C. R., Child"
Results 21 - 40
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2007, 8:06 am
As before, custody matters are not to be decided by a jury. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Circumstances of contemporary daily interactions between men and women, warrants that the “opportunity” element of proof of adultery must be interpreted to mean more that mere “proximity,” but must instead necessarily mean “proximity plus. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:01 am
” In that order, the court held Hagel in contempt for various reasons, including smoking around Child, “harassing” Young’s spouse, and for a child support arrearage; entered judgment against her for $850 related to unpaid child support; and “restrained” her from “calling [the] cops to do welfare checks” on Child and from “calling CPS. [read post]
17 May 2020, 10:18 am
If the matter does not affect the children directly, the court will not consider that matter when awarding parenting time. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Maternity and Child Welfare Act 1918 Hazel Biggs16. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:13 am
Blending science, culture, compassion and philosophy with legal precedent, Justice Matthew F. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 8:21 am
Rossiter, 583 F.3d 967, 970 (7th Cir. 2009). [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
C. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:03 pm
While the figures on disadvantage might not be conclusive, that didn’t matter, as the policy was clearly not designed with the ‘least intrusive measure’ in mind. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 1:19 pm
In re Welfare of M.G. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:36 pm
C. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm
JAMES VALLIERE, Appellees. 4th District.Dissolution of marriage -- Child custody -- Visitation -- It was error for trial court to delegate to a counselor the authority to establish visitation between mother and minor daughterKRISTIN LAROCKA, Appellant, v. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 6:07 am
Dutkanych, 493 NE 2d 1037 – Ill: Supreme Court 1986 “Sanctions under Rule 219(c) (103 Ill.2d R. 219(c)) are to be imposed only when the noncompliance is unreasonable and the order entered is just. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
Even the staunchest meat eaters do eat plant matter on occasion, so they will not be horrified to learn that they just ate something made of plants. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Rather, “[c]ourts must decide the applicability of comment k case-by-case, and only after taking evidence related to the various factors. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am
A parenting report was ordered by consent in September 2021 under s 211 of the Family Law Act, SBC 2011, c 25 (BC FLA). [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 3:05 pm
Taken in reverse order, we can pass quickly over (D) and (C). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
A controlled substance named or described in s. 893.03(1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(d), (2)(a), (2)(b), or (2)(c) 4., commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084 [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:55 pm
In re Greg F. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 2:41 pm
Doesn't matter if you're a murderer, everybody deserves a second chance. [read post]
