Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. B. and W. S., Parents."
Results 21 - 40
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
The Positive Parenting Project: A Collaborative Local Initiative in the Therapeutic Justice Movement
25 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
The goal is to reunite parent and child, without the child having to testify, and give the parent more parenting support tools to help them along this road as his/her child ages. [read post]
12 May 2017, 2:49 pm
(a)(b)(1); count 1), and resisted an officer (§ 148, subd. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
President George W. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
(b).) [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
And a parent may ‘curtail a child's exercise of the constitutional rights . . . [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
“[W]hat exactly,” he asks, “was the ‘social harm’ identified by the Reynolds Court? [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
In his motion respondent relies on recent appellate authority, to wit Matter of Vitti, 202 A.D.2d 917, 609 N.Y.S.2d 686 (3rd Dept.1994) which holds that Family Court Act Article 8 does not authorize imposition of consecutive commitments. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:40 pm
McFarlane J echoed what he had said in Re W about the importance of parents taking responsibility for their children’s relationship with both parents: at para 59 Re D (A Child) [2014] EWCA Civ 1057, It is they [the parents] who, on those findings, hold the key that might unlock matters for B. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:23 pm
That case follows hot on the heels of Re B (A Child) [2013] UKSC 33. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 5:10 am
[W]e conclude that the trial court’s findings are supported by a preponderance of the evidence. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
At its September 30, 2013 Conference, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the termination of parental rights under the Indian Child Welfare Act, the constitutionality of Virginia’s “crimes against nature” statute, protections on free speech interests of government employees, and a free exercise challenge to workers’ compensation requirements. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 4:20 pm
S and her contradicting conclusion that the child had no hymen, the only evidence of the claimant's guilt. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am
Parent’s Incarceration Not an Automatic Reason for Blocking Visitation In Matter of Granger v Miscercola, --- N.E.2d ----, 2013 WL 1798581 (N. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:59 pm
The statute considers a parent’s affirmative acts of abuse against a child, as well as any omissions and failures to act, resulting in the impairment of a child’s physical and emotional well-being. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:11 am
Law Lessons from IN THE MATTER OF T.B., a minor, App. [read post]
7 May 2011, 3:05 am
Parental rights are constitutionally protected, and the Division’s right to intervene is based on “the State’s parens patriae responsibility to protect the welfare of children. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
§ 1395y(b)(2)(B)(i). [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
Justice S. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:08 pm
A.B.C. in the matter of P.C., a minor, __ N.J. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:48 pm
For example, in Re LM (Reporting Restrictions: Coroner’s Inquest) ([2007] EWHC 1902 (Fam)) the court refused to make orders in relation to the identity of the parents and family members in an inquest but made an order preventing the publication of the name of the child. [read post]
