Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. S. and M. S., Parents."
Results 21 - 40
of 61
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
I’m not sure why they think a signature is all it takes to terminate a parent-child relationship…because that’s definitely not how it works in Illinois. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
The law has evolved to recognize legal parent-child relationships, regardless of the marital status of the child’s parents. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
The Code does not typically have special rules for special areas of practice, but family violence is not strictly a family law matter. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 1:34 pm
Self-responsibilization through technology involves an increasing emphasis on individuals actively taking responsibility—though technology—for their own welfare, health, education etc. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm
Fordice (1992) (Thomas, J., concurring)). [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:01 am
Morris, J., denied mother’s motion to set aside default order. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:59 pm
My excellent pro bono local counsel Jeffrey M. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
Masha M. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm
The one-hour deadline applies to content that French authorities consider to be related to terrorism or child sexual abuse. [read post]
15 May 2020, 6:20 am
When evaluating where the balance lies between these two competing rights and interests it is important, to my mind, that judges of the Family Court do not allow ourselves to remain magnetically attracted to the welfare principle (i.e. that the welfare of the child is the paramount consideration). [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 12:30 pm
Hospital: Not without approval from Hamilton County, Ohio child welfare officials. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm
Hillingdon sent J’s solicitors a ‘Child and Family Assessment’ dated 5 June 2017. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 9:20 am
To make matters even more grave, this case was a domestic violence matter. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 9:20 am
To make matters even more grave, this case was a domestic violence matter. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
“It’s déjà vu all over again. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 11:09 am
The judgment following the rehearing in the case of M (Children) [2016] EWCA Civ 61 (02 February 2016) has now been published, see Re M (No 2) [2016] EWHC 1658 (Fam) (19 May 2016), a judgment of Newton J. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
’ (Welfare and Institutions Code section § 730, subd. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:40 pm
The petition calls for two specific actions, firstly : Ensuring that domestic abuse is identified and its impact fully considered by the family court judiciary and that child arrangements orders put the best interests of the child(ren) first and protect the well-being of the parent the child(ren) is living with, in accordance with Practice Direction 12 J Child Arrangements & Contact Order: Domestic Violence and Harm. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:08 pm
They were removed from the child custody of their natural parents in February 1982 after it was determined that the five-year-old Debbie had contracted gonorrhea of the throat. [read post]
