Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: P. S., Parent" Results 21 - 40 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Moreover, where a parent knowingly acts in a manner injurious to a child's welfare by engaging in excessive corporal punishment causing physical injury to achild, he cannot justify those acts because he believed them necessary to promote the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2d at 365). [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:40 pm by familoo
There was also guidance issued in relation to the approval of consent orders – judges were reminded care was needed even when parties appeared to have agreed matters. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Moreover, where a parent knowingly acts in a manner injurious to a child's welfare by engaging in excessive corporal punishment causing physical injury to achild, he cannot justify those acts because he believed them necessary to promote the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2d at 365). [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The government cannot condition a parent's right to raise her children on periodic home inspection unsupported by probable cause. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:33 am by Madelaine Lane
In Morris, the childs biological father appealed the termination of his parental rights. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:15 am by Eugene Volokh
" Suffice it to say, a parent's right to the care, custody, and control of one's child includes a constitutionally protected right to make decisions regarding the child's education—including the choice to homeschool. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 8:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
“[T]he language of [section] 1914 itself ... limits standing to challenge state-law terminations of parental right to parents ‘from whose custody such child was removed’ ” (Matter of Adoption of Child of Indian Heritage, 111 N.J. 155, 179, 543 A.2d 925, 937, quoting 25 USC § 1914; see Matter of S.C., 1992 OK 98, ¶ 23, 833 P.2d 1249, 1254, overruled on other grounds Matter of Baby Boy L., 2004 OK… [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm by Guest Blogger
 So too, Sawhill argues that family structure matters for child well-being. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:29 am by Guest Blogger
(The Invisible Safety Net, p. 8, although I note that she was talking about the uncertain benefits of cash welfare programs that encourage parents to work and not other parenting programs more broadly). [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 1:08 pm
§ 1912(f) requires contemporaneous evidence that leaving the child in the custody of the Indian parent will likely harm the child. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those cases were Matter of Adoption of Baby Boy D[28] and Matter of Adoption of D.M.J.[29]  In Baby Boy D, the father was a member of the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma and the mother was a non-Indian.[30]  The mother consented to adoption of Baby Boy D and the child was adopted without notice to the father and without his consent.[31]  After learning that the child had been adopted, the father filed a petition seeking to vacate the adoption on… [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 10:43 am by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
” He pointed out that “the New Jersey Supreme Court has recognized that a childs parent and/or primary caretaker may be an essential focus of childs life, and source of fulfillment of not just the childs physical needs, but also his or her emotional and psychological needs and well-being. [read post]