Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R. S., Parent"
Results 21 - 40
of 445
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
Under Maryland law, both parents are responsible for the care, welfare, support, and education of their children until each child graduates high school or turns 19 years old, whichever occurs first. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
Legal CustodyLegal custody is about which parent will make the decisions with regard to the child's health, education and welfare. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:59 pm
., A-2403-09T2, February 18, 2011: Legal custody of a child, as opposed to physical custody, has been defined as “the legal authority and responsibility for making ‘major’ decisions regarding the child’s welfare . . . . [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
In my previous blog entry, I posted my proposal for amendments to the Indian Child Welfare Act. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 6:19 pm
Adoption is intended to create lifelong parent-child relationships, and irrevocable parental obligations, no matter the challenges the newly-formed family might face in integrating an adopted son or daughter. [read post]
19 May 2022, 4:00 am
Physical custody refers to where the child will live, while legal custody gives one or both parents the right to make decisions about the child’s education, health, and welfare. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 7:00 am
The proposed child welfare law certification focuses on attorneys who serve as ad litems for children and parents or who represent the state in child protection cases brought by the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 10:05 am
Judge Jones noted that the cost of the daughter’s insurance in this case was reasonable and affordable for a used ten year old vehicle provided to the child if both parents contribute equally. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:46 am
., A-4073-09T2, August 17, 2011: When deciding matters involving child custody, “the court’s primary consideration is the best interests of the children. [read post]
13 May 2016, 6:35 am
For one, parents are legally responsible for the care and general welfare of their children, including financial support. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:57 am
Clearly, the California court has focused on the court's power to restrain the custodial parent's right to relocate depending on its effect on the child's welfare. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 10:00 am
As a practical matter, when does a court have reason to believe a child is an “Indian child”? [read post]
27 May 2016, 6:05 am
The Maryland Family Law Code makes clear that parents are responsible for their child’s support, including their care, nurture, welfare, and education. [read post]
7 May 2007, 3:06 pm
Keeping in mind that complexity and coverage of a parenting agreement will vary from case-to-case, these agreements typically cover areas such as: Where the child will live (including living arrangements and visitation schedules); If one parent will have primary physical custody, a detailed description of the non-custodial parent's visitation rights (including schedules); Who will be involved in major decisions related to the… [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 9:00 am
Rptr. 3d 565 , the California Supreme Court held that Welfare & Institutions Code section 300(f), which allows an initial adjudication of dependency if the child's parent caused the death of another child through neglect, does not require proof of criminal neglect. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 8:30 am
And, it is typically found that a continued relationship with both of a child’s parents will be in the child’s best interests. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 9:22 pm
Sometimes all-out legal warfare is declared by parents who refuse to think of what's in their child's best interests. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 10:49 am
The court went on: Where the privilege is claimed on behalf of the parent rather than that of the child, or where the welfare and interest of the minor will not be protected, a parent should not be permitted to either claim the privilege or, for that matter, to waive it. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The legal complications surrounding Baby Veronica’s custody arose from an apparent conflict between the federal Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), a 1978 law designed to reduce improper removals of Indian children from their parents and their placement with non-Indian families, and South Carolina’s rules regarding the rights of unwed fathers. [read post]
