Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. R. D. and J. D., Parents" Results 21 - 33 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The legal complications surrounding Baby Veronica’s custody arose from an apparent conflict between the federal Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), a 1978 law designed to reduce improper removals of Indian children from their parents and their placement with non-Indian families, and South Carolina’s rules regarding the rights of unwed fathers. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am by The Legal Blog
Aditya Bandopadhyay, has examined the relevant provisions of the Right to Information Act while deciding a matter relating to the denial of right of right of inspection and re-evaluation of question papers by the Central Board of Secondary Education. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those cases were Matter of Adoption of Baby Boy D[28] and Matter of Adoption of D.M.J.[29]  In Baby Boy D, the father was a member of the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma and the mother was a non-Indian.[30]  The mother consented to adoption of Baby Boy D and the child was adopted without notice to the father and without his consent.[31]  After learning that the child had been adopted, the father filed a petition seeking… [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:43 am by Eoin Daly
As committed Jehovah’s Witnesses, they opposed the procedure on grounds of religious belief, but it was necessary to save the childs life. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
The master characterized the atmosphere in Judge Ciavarella’s court as casting such a “pall” over the functioning of that court, its integrity was subverted, and recommended that each and every adjudication of a child in that court be vacated.[12] The recommendation included every child, whether having the benefit of counsel or not, and every child, whether or not sent to PA Child Care, or anywhere for that matter. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:35 pm by Michael Ginsborg
Pete Stark, D-Calif., re-introduced the “Every Child Deserves a Family Act,” H.R. 4806 (previous bill, H.R. 3827). [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
The latest issue of the Rabels Zeitschrift (Vol. 73, No. 4, October 2009)   is a special issue on the occasion of the 60th birthday of Professor Jürgen Basedow and contains the following articles: Dietmar Baetge: Contingency Fees – An Economic Analysis of the Federal Constitutional Court’s Decision Authorising Attorney Contingency Fees – the English abstract reads as follows: In Germany, until recently,… [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
Cornelio to continue to contribute toward the children's material needs.[24] Even if this matter were approached on the basis of fairness to the respondent, I would conclude that his child support obligations toward the twins continues notwithstanding that he is not their biological father. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 12:19 pm
In a matter of first impression, Justice John Hedigan of the High Court of Ireland (a trial court) has ruled in J. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 3:07 am
The juvenile court was envisioned more as a surrogate parent than a prosecutor. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 1:17 pm
The author examines bias against fathers in parenting matters, critiquing the Supreme Court's stereotypic view of fatherhood as a status and suggesting that the Court use a relational, nurturing standard for determining a father's parental rights. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:54 am
.  A2190 Bacalles -- Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided by the county or city of New York to such non-indigent prisoners while in prisonSUMM : Amd SS500-h, 500-n & 508, Cor L Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided to them by the county or city of New York while such non-indigent prisoners are in prison. 01/16/07 referred to correction LAW / CORRECTNSA2228 Lafayette (MS) -- Provides for the… [read post]