Search for: "Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs"
Results 21 - 40
of 496
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 12:12 pm
UtilCorp United, Inc., 497 U.S. 199 (1990); because plaintiffs were “indirect purchasers,” defendants argued that they lacked standing to prosecute the antitrust class action. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:53 pm
Thus, the Indirect Purchaser class has obtained 80% on the basis of Home City’s sales as the Direct Purchaser class. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 2:43 pm
Today, the Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs filed their motion for preliminary approval and authorization to disseminate notice of their settlement with Defendant The Home City Ice Company. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 6:14 am
” Thus, the court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to certify either the direct or indirect purchaser class. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:30 am
Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins of the Northern District of California held that California Corporations Code sections 25400(d) and 25500 permit suits by “indirect purchasers” of pre-IPO shares, i.e. purchasers who bought securities interests from intermediaries and not from the issuer. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 10:31 am
Cir. 1992) (holding where plaintiff sought to establish 'lost profits' as remedy for claim of indirect infringement, amount of lost profits could only be based on six of ten sales of accused device, because plaintiff did not establish remaining four sales resulted in act of direct infringement by purchaser). [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:31 am
The court granted in part plaintiff's motion to send a survey to defendant’s customers concerning potential indirect infringement. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 10:25 am
Judge Gonzales Rogers thus dismissed the indirect purchasers’ suit for lack of standing without leave to amend. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 1:10 am
Because the plaintiffs were indirect purchases of concrete, they needed to prove both that the impact on direct purchasers and that the subsequent impact on indirect purchasers were susceptible to proof through common evidence. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 8:30 pm
However, the settlements do not include related pending actions brought by direct purchaser plaintiffs, including drug stores and the consumer class. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 5:26 am
The courthouse door in North Carolina is now wide open to antitrust plaintiffs making indirect purchaser claims, after the Court of Appeals' decision this week in Teague v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
As such, plaintiffs were indirect purchasers to whom the direct purchaser banks passed on all or a part of the allegedly fixed fees, and their claims were barred by the Illinois Brick indirect purchaser rule. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 4:51 am
In evaluating whether to certify the proposed class of indirect purchaser plaintiffs, the Court noted that a “district court has broad discretion to grant or deny a class certification. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 4:57 am
After summarizing the legal framework surrounding certification of class actions in indirect purchaser antitrust class actions, see Somers, at 358-59, the district court turned to the request for certification under Rule 23(b)(3). [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the settlement must be vacated because the lower court had improperly certified a nationwide class of indirect purchasers despite recognizing that some of those plaintiffs would be barred from pursuing such indirect claims under the laws of their own states. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:22 am
The motion was filed by indirect purchaser plaintiffs in this lithium ion batteries antitrust litigation. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 3:08 am
In Alloway, the plaintiff purchased a defective boat, which was built by the (manufacturer) defendant. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 11:45 am
So even though federal law bars these claims, class-action defendants still face them when a separate group of indirect-purchaser class plaintiffs sue in federal court under a hodgepodge of state antitrust laws. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:51 am
The court dismissed the indirect purchaser plaintiffs’ complaint on similar grounds, concluding that the complaint did not satisfy the plausibility standard. [read post]
