Search for: "Intercontinental Holdings Inc"
Results 21 - 33
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2018, 3:01 am
-- SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am
Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc., et al. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
We hold that it is not. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
In Seven & i Holdings Co., Ltd. and 7-Eleven, Inc. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
(IP Think Tank) Whitehouse.gov’s 3rd party content under CC-BY (Creative Commons) EFF’s site FreeYourPhone.org launches, pushes for new DMCA exemption (Ars Technica) Corporation of Public Broadcasting agrees on internet royalty payments (ContentAgenda) Music piracy not that bad, industry says (TorrentFreak) US Copyright – Decisions District Court W D Virginia: Judge decides 17,000 illegal downloads don’t equal 17,000 lost sales: United States of… [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 5:04 am
MAGA Inc, a super PAC supporting former President Trump, has accused Flori [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 12:09 pm
KB Home Lone Star LP., No. 07-0815 (Aug. 28, 2009)(Willett) (prevailing party for attorney fees purposes) INTERCONTINENTAL GROUP PARTNERSHIP v. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
. * * * We hold that, at the time the parties’ agreement was made, (1) the harm that would result from a breach was difficult to estimate and (2) the liquidated damages provision reasonably forecast just compensation. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 4:46 am
Cpunto Inc and Electronic Network Inc, two electronics distribution companies, have been made subject to U.S. export restrictions for “acting contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States,” according to the Department of Commerce. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 5:56 pm
Domains by Proxy, Inc. 2. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:13 am
Below is our quarterly newsletter. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
2022 was a tale of two halves for M&A. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm
For that reason, the Court’s holding was understandably narrow—ruling that, “the provisions of the Utah Constitution that guarantee Utah citizens’ rights to ‘communicate freely their thoughts and opinions’ do not extend protection to nude dancing,” even though the First Amendment might offer such protection. [read post]
