Search for: "International Transport, Inc. v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2018, 12:10 pm by Steven Boutwell
” In matters involving international trade, contracts for carriage – involving goods shipped to or from the United States via a foreign seaport – are those covered by a bill of lading or any similar document of title. [read post]
  Because Freightplus did not have the means to transport the REBEL, Freightplus contracted with Yacht Path International, Inc. [read post]
  Because Freightplus did not have the means to transport the REBEL, Freightplus contracted with Yacht Path International, Inc. [read post]
  Because Freightplus did not have the means to transport the REBEL, Freightplus contracted with Yacht Path International, Inc. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
For publication opinions today (3): In Star Transport, Inc. and Jeffrey Cottingham v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:57 pm by Native American Rights Fund
City of El Paso (Tribal Real Property) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlMitchell v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:57 pm by Unknown
City of El Paso (Tribal Real Property) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlMitchell v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
In last week’s judgment in the case of Bou Malhab v Diffusion Métromedia CMR Inc (2011 SCC 9)  the Supreme Court of Canada refused to permit a “class action” for libel by Arabic and Creole speaking Montreal taxi drivers who had been subjected to racist and abusive coments by Andre Arthur, a “shock jock” (turned MP)(pictured right) in the course of a radio broadcast. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1334(a) and (b) and the Standing Order of Reference entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 12:11 pm by Andrew Frisch
Because Morris involved transportation of goods not passengers, the Third Circuit looked at cases arising in other contexts that defined interstate transportation of passengers, including United States v. [read post]