Search for: "Interstate Police v. C. & S. Bank"
Results 21 - 40
of 56
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Cruz-Diaz, No. 07-1534, 07-1535 Armed bank-robbery convictions are affirmed, despite one bank teller's doubt as to whether the gun was real, where eyewitness testimony, the bank's surveillance video, and the discovery of a bullet casing in the getaway car were all consistent with the finding that the gun was real. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:34 am
Code § 875(c), which makes it a federal crime to transmit a threat in interstate commerce. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 10:01 pm
Stop, Frisk, Arrest, Convict, Affirm: Where police received a 911 call for as [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
Hewitt, 329 U.S. 249, 252-53 (1946)) or “No State has the right to lay a tax on interstate commerce in any form” (Leloup v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:13 am
GoldsteneDocket: 10-1555Issue(s): (1) Whether the Commerce Clause and the Supremacy Clause prohibit California's extraterritorial exercise of its police powers to require the use of specified low-sulfur fuels on foreign- and U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Insley's, Inc. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Black, No. 06-4986 In a prosecution for firearms possession and drug possession, defendant's sentence and a denial of his motion to suppress are affirmed where: 1) the totality of the circumstances surrounding the defendant's encounter with police would give rise to reasonable suspicion to support a Terry stop and a subsequent pat down; and 2) there was no error in an upward departure from the recommended Guidelines sentence based on the substantial… [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Bank, Old Republic, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
It represents a shifting of coercive power from the external-the state, the police, and the institution to the internal-the individual and the private. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm
§ 3582, and (2) whether during a § 3582(c)(2) sentencing, a district court is required to impose sentence based on an admittedly incorrectly calculated guideline range. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm
Way back in 1983, in Bearden v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Washington, No. 07-1523, 07-1884, 07-2541 Federal district courts lack the inherent power to vacate a sentence procured by fraud, any such power having been abrogated by the enactment of 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c) and the amendments to FRCP 35. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Jimenez, No. 05-4098 "A check kiting scheme involving only one bank, where the defendant moved funds between various accounts at that institution, still violates the bank fraud statute as long as the elements of bank fraud are satisfied. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Carmenate , No. 072421 Conviction for bank fraud is affirmed where defendant's waiver of his constitutional right to a jury trial was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent in light of defendant's: 1) presence at a pre-trial conference at which his attorney requested a bench trial; 2) presence at another pre-trial conference at which the District Court requested a written waiver; 3) counsel's letter to the District Court requesting a bench trial; 4)… [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm
Police call paramedics, who examine him, find him breathing normally, and say he's fine. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
Lee, No. 06-3438A sentence and restitution order for bank fraud and aggravated identity theft is affirmed in part as to the restitution order as defendant's challenge to it was precluded by his plea agreement. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
Hyde Park Savings Bank, 14-116 (addressing appealability in a bankruptcy proceeding)). [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm
Society’s response to domestic violence[10] Aside from funding more police and women and children’s shelters, society’s prime response to domestic violence has been the ability to obtain civil protection orders.6. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Williams, No. 07-1354 The interstate transport of a minor for prostitution in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 2423(a) constitutes a crime of violence for purposes of the career offender provision of the Sentencing Guidelines. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Supreme Court, June 18, 2008 Munaf v. [read post]
